Thursday, June 30, 2005

How Moonbats Celebrate July 4th

"This Fourth of July, I ask you to find a way to thank the men and women defending our freedom by flying the flag..." -George W. Bush


The blog of criminal defense Denver attorney Jeralyn Merritt, TalkLeft: The Politics of Crime, advises readers how to go about answering the President's plea to give thanks to those who put themselves in harm's way defending freedom.
"July 4th: Listen to the President
Hit the freeways. Cardboard and paint is all it takes.
Join Freeway Blogger's Summer of Truth.

"Signpainting parties against the war are being organized across the country over the 4th of July weekend with posting scheduled to start on the 5th. So far we have over 400 confirmed freewaybloggers for this action and should have well over a thousand by week's end."
While most Americans will be flying Old Glory, roasting weiners and having fun, the "true patriots" amongst us, the moonbats, will be walking the highways and byways of the land, posting placards for you to read. You may be lucky and spot this one somewhere in your neighborhood, brought to you by the folks at Freeway Blogger.
Trackedback at Outside the Beltway, Wizbang's Carnival of Trackbacks, and Mudville Gazette.

Every Blogger's Doing It

Morphing Blogs into Web Magazines

Have you morphed your blog into an "On-line Magazine" yet? Why not, practically every other blogger has, according to CNN. Bob Brigham of Swing State Project tells us how to lose blogging buddies and gain MSM friends. He writes in a post entitled "Blogging Dies to Save Blogging", that after he switched, it felt like he had won the lottery. "Socially I am living a rags to riches fairytale. Yesterday, I was friends with a bunch of 'bloggers' but today I'm friends with honest to goodness 'members of the press' -- living the high life like a member of the Gang of 500. You too can improve your social standing with a single post, ".

Trey Jackson has the video of CNN (wmv) and the discussion of the blogs, Jackson's Junction: Video: "Inside the Online Magazines".

TalkLeft.com has a post today entitled "The Day the Bloggers Died":
"As of yesterday, blogs are dead. Say hello to the Online Magazine Community. Others joining so far:

"TalkLeft is joining the community. We are now 'the online magazine for liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news.'"
The Talent Show has posted the transcript from the CNN discussion of blogs, er ... "Web Magazines":
TATTON: Yeah. And back to the left side. I just mentioned Atrios. This is Escaton who up until yesterday was a blogger, now announcing himself -- Escaton, an online magazine of news, commentary and editorial. And you've got the background how all that happened.

SCHECHNER: We'll tell you how this evolved. So, Duncan Black is one of several bloggers who has been testifying before the Federal Elections Commission over the past couple of days. They have been addressing the issue of who is a journalist, who is a blog. How should campaign regulation be extended into the blogosphere, if it should at all. They are all saying no, it should not.

But Duncan has some questions, wondering why he was treated differently as a blogger than he would be as a media entity. For example, why is Salon.com entitled to the media exemption, but not him. This sparked something.

TATTON: Yeah. Those questions raised over at Escaton. This post here from the talentshow.org, also until yesterday a blog. The site's host realized the potential pit falls of being a blogger in this day and age of potential FEC regulations. So, they've taken drastic measures. They're no longer calling themselves a blog, instead, a web magazine.

They say the content's going to look the same, the site's going to look the same, but the changes as far as the FEC is concerned will be drastic. Just in the name there. Starting tomorrow, my days as a blogger are ending and my days as a writer are beginning. Now, this has sparked lots of different people getting on this bandwagon doing the same thing. They update today looking at some of the sites doing the same thing. One of them is talkleft.com, who declared the day the bloggers died saying that we are now the online magazine for liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news. So, lots of people jumping on this.

SCHECHNER: Over at Swing State Project, Bob Brigham doing the same thing, saying he used to be friends with bloggers and now he is friends with members of the press. So you too can improve your social standing with one single post.

TATTON: So, lots of fun posts on this. But this is a very important topic to bloggers with a very important message out there for the FEC. Do not regulate us. We've been saying that all week. And that concludes today's installment, Suzanne, of inside the online magazines, back to you.
Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters says that he's not doing it! This Is a Blog. This Will Remain a Blog, and he explains why. Trackedback at Blogs for Bush.

Wednesday, June 29, 2005

Saddam and Osama, Best Buds

I never believed in the link between Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden, al-Qaeda and Islamist terrorism,” ~~former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, October 21, 2003, "Australia’s Melbourne Herald Sun".

As we all know by now, there was never a proven link between Saddam, al-Qaida or even the Crips.” ~~"Washington Post" columnist Richard Cohen, May 2005.

The evidence now shows clearly that Saddam did not want to work with Osama bin Laden at all.” ~~August 2003, former vice president Albert Gore.

"Iraq was not a terrorist haven before the invasion,... Iraq was not even close to the center of the War on Terror before the president invaded it." ~~Democratic candidate John Kerry, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, September 2004.

Iraq was not a breeding ground for terrorism. Our invasion has made it one, ... We were told Iraq was attracting terrorists from Al Qaeda. It was not.” ~~Senator Ted Kennedy, October 16, 2003.

Whenever you hear the old saw that there was NO connection between Saddam Hussein's Iraq and Osama Bin Ladin and that we went to war with Iraq for the wrong reason, check out the facts at Saddam Hussein's Philanthropy of Terror by Deroy Murdock, Media Fellow, Hoover Institution at Stanford University. This was adapted from a September 22, 2004 presentation at the Hoover Institution. There are more facts than anyone would have time to read. An excellent article! It ends by saying that Saddam Hussein deserves to be where he is right now - behind bars.

There are more links between Bin Laden and Hussein, according to Andrew C. McCarthy's "It's All About 9-11", in "National Review On-line". To learn more of Saddam's terrorist handiwork, Deroy Murdock recommends reading the Stephen Hayes book, "The Connection: How al Qaeda's Collaboration with Saddam Hussein Has Endangered America".

Fireworks in Space

This Fourth of July is being called "Day of the Comet", because there will be fireworks in space during the very early morning hours, and you should be able to see them. After having traveled 268 million miles in space, NASA’s Deep Impact spacecraft will get up-close and engage comet Tempel 1 on July 4th, 2005. People world-wide will be able to view both the impact and resulting data and pictures of the interior of an exploding comet. An object the size of a coffee table will hit another object the size of a small automobile, at a force of 23,000 miles per hour. Deep Impact: Your First Look Inside a Comet!
"Like people gazing skyward to watch Independence Day fireworks, an international array of telescopes will train expert eyes on a dramatic encounter between NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft and a passing comet. The explosive event will happen 133.6 million kilometers (83 million miles) from Earth in the early hours of July 4 Eastern Daylight Time (late July 3 Pacific Daylight Time). Telescopes on the ground and others orbiting in space will document the mission's crucial moments using different wavelengths of light." (NASA)
Tags:[]

The 1805 Trafalgar Triumph

Off the coast of Portsmouth, England, the British are celebrating the 200th anniversary of the great naval rout by their Admiral Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar.

Has it been 200 years already? My how time flies; it seems like only yesterday that the British, after being ousted by their American colonials, achieved the great victory at sea over Napolean and France. That victory bucked up the Tories so that they sailed back over to the other side of the Atlantic to take revenge on the upstart new cousin country. The British redcoats learned a lesson or two, finally, taught by General Andrew Jackson at the Battle of New Orleans. Isn't it amazing how history just goes on and on until we finally wind down to today, which actually seems like only yesterday.

The original Anglo-Franco sea skirmish broke out on October 21, 1805, off the Spanish coast, and the victory by Britain against France, spelled the beginning of the end for Napoleon Bonaparte's conquest of Europe.
Britain Honors 1805 Trafalgar Triumph: "PORTSMOUTH, England - Seventeen tall ships from five countries held a mock sea battle Tuesday off England's coast to mark the 200th anniversary of the Battle of Trafalgar, Adm. Horatio Nelson's stunning victory at sea that gave Britain naval supremacy for a century."
It would certainly be fair to say that England saved Europe from becoming French 200 years ago, and then again just recently, the English prime minister, Tony Blair, battled the French once again at Brussels, and vanquished Jacques "new Napolean" Chirac from seizing control of the continent in 2005.

Trackedback at basil's blog and Chrenkoff, where Arthur has more information entitled "Nelson Rolling on his Column".

Tuesday, June 28, 2005

Why Didn't Rehnquist Retire?

Intrigues from the Most High Court, with an interesting prediction from KN@PPSTER who says "I'm suspicious".
"Prediction: Rehnquist will give notice of his retirement on the afternoon that the Senate goes into its holiday recess. Bush will make a recess appointment -- effectively putting whomever he wants in as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court through 2006, if I read it right. From C-SPAN:

"Any recess appointment the President makes during the first session of a Congress will last until the end of its second session [each Congress is split into two sessions of approximately one year each].

"If I'm right, you read it here first. If not ... well, you read it here first anyway."
Could be; wait and see, says Kerfuffles. I wonder if that would be a wise thing for Bushy to do? He is one wily coyote, that Bush, and I would not be at all surprised if he and Karl Rove have already made the plans as reported by ScrappleFace:
Bush May Condemn and Seize Supreme Court
by Scott Ott (2005-06-24) -- A day after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that local governments may seize private property to promote economic development, President George Bush said he may soon move to seize the high court under "the executive branch's power of eminent domain."

Technorati Tag:

"God Save ...This ... Court"

from Smashing the Tablets of Stone
Moses and the Ten Commandments
The majority of the black robed justices ruled that the displaying of granite tablets of the Ten Commandments was not "free speech" and was unconstitutional in Kentucky courthouses. They further ruled that county officials were displaying them in order to advance religion, and that the First Amendment required that government be neutral. The dissenting voices were Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Clarence Thomas, and in part Anthony Kennedy. Justice Scalia argued that the belief that government must always be neutral to religion is itself unconstitutional, reminding the justices that the Supreme Court opens every session with the words 'God save the United States and this Honorable Court.' Justice Souter and the majority of the court had ruled that 'the First Amendment mandates government neutrality between religion and nonreligion.' Justice Scalia sharply disagreed with him. 'Who says so?' he asked. 'Surely not the words of the Constitution. Surely not the history and traditions that reflect our society's constant understanding [of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause].'
"Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Justice Antonin Scalia, reading from the bench, argued that the Decalogue should always be allowed because the framers intended religion to be part of public life and because 97.9 percent of Americans who espouse religion - Christians, Jews and Muslims - believe in the ancient laws. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the deciding vote in the Kentucky case, countered "We do not count heads before enforcing the First Amendment."

Thomas Jefferson, the third president of the United States, and author of much of the nation's founding documents, predicted the fate of the Constitution in the hands of justices such as O'Connor and Souter. Jefferson wrote:
"The Constitution ... is a mere thing of wax in the hands of the judiciary which they may twist and shape into any form they please."

The First Amendment

and it's "Establishment Clause"

Virginia's Declaration of Rights, written by George Mason, was adopted by the Virginia Constitutional Convention on June 12, 1776. The document was drawn upon by Thomas Jefferson when he scribed the opening paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. It also became the basis of the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The last section mentions religion:
"Section 16. That religion, or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and therefore all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practise Christian forbearance, love, and charity toward each other."
Interesting it be, that years later in 1789, when the Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution, the very first Amendment dealt with religion. Religion had moved in importance from the last clause in Virginia's Declaration of Rights, to the first in the new American Constitution. It is worded much more simply; anyone can understand the meaning. Read the exact words from the Constitution:
"Amendment I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
For those who have never read the Constitution, it is surprising that there is no mention of the infamous mantra "separation of church and state". That phrase does not exist in the Constitution. In fact, the understanding of the First Amendment is that citizens are free to practice any religion and the Congress is not to prohibit them from doing so. In addition, the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speach and of the press. Engraving the Ten Commandants onto a religious tract, or onto a granite tablet is undeniably a form of "speech". Two counties in Kentucky utilized that form of speech and posted the ancient biblical laws inside of their courthouses, and yesterday, they were ruled against by a majority of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Tags:[]

Monday, June 27, 2005

George Was Wrong

said five of the black robed rulers of the land!

George Washington, the father of our nation said "It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible."

Today, 27 June 2005, the majority of the United States Supreme Court pronounced that George Washington was wrong. The court refused (5-4) to allow the display of the Ten Commandments in two Kentucky courthouses,because they ruled that county officials were displaying them to advance religion despite the First Amendment's requirement that government be neutral.

James Madison, the chief architect of the Constitution, stated: “We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of our republic upon the capacity of each and all of our citizens to govern themselves and thereby sustain our own selves, according to the Ten Commandments of God.

Thomas Jefferson, said "Our Constitution was written for a nation that believed in the Almighty God of the Holy Bible."

Even Andrew Jackson, a Democrat, believed as he said "The Bible is the rock on which our republic rests".

"The Bible is the sheet anchor of our liberties" said Ulysses S. Grant.

The Supreme Court of the United States has proclaimed that these early leaders of our nation, were all wrong!

Tags:[]

Freedom Comes Hard II

Son of HyscienceHere is a blogger's son, on the right, fighting for freedom. Hyscience entitles the image as "Firm and decisive action including necessary force when and where needed" and further writes that it demonstrates:
"the conservative's choice of tools for fighting terrorism and fighting the mindless Islamists in Iraq instead of in our own neighborhoods: How do I know that these guys are conservatives? Answer - first of all, the guy on the right is my son! Second, our armed forces overwhelmingly voted for George W. Bush. And that's a fact, Jack.
God Bless Us All - each and every one, especially American parents with sons and daughters in the fight for freedom! And God, please inspire these precious sons of America to wear helmets when firing at the enemy.

Check out Freedom Comes Hard I, Trackedback at Hyscience.
Tags:[]

The Connecticut Kerfuffle

On Thursday of this week, liberalism and its "big government" credo triumphed. The various governing bodies of these United States have now become radically empowered to seize the very kinds of private property that governments should be guaranteeing to individual property owners.

According to the Fifth Amendment, U.S. citizens are guaranteed property rights, among other things. It reads, "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation". ALL of the fifty state constitutions agree with the framers of the U.S. Constitution's Framers that takings must be for "public use." We have always believed that the Constitution intended "public" to mean that private property could only be taken to create public things, owned or used by the general public, such as roads, bridges, etcetera.

On Thursday the Supreme Court was asked, according to columnist George Will in the Charlotte Observer: "Can government profit by seizing the property of people of modest means and giving it to wealthy people who can pay more taxes than can be extracted from the original owners? The court answered yes." Or as Justice Antonin Scalia asked during oral arguments in February,"You can take from A and give to B if B pays more taxes?"

The majority opinion written by Justice John Paul Stevens and joined by justices Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer, changed the meaning of the word "public" in the Constitution's "public use" phrase of the Fifth Amendment, aka the heartily fought for "Bill of Rights"
.

The dissent written by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, and joined by Chief Justice William Rehnquist, Justice Clarence Thomas and Scalia, noted that the decision's beneficiaries will "likely" be those "with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms." Doesn't this sound as though the conservatives are for the "little guy" who owns a plot of land in some nowhere Podunk and that the liberals are for the "evil" big corporations?

For more elucidation on this current New London and eminent domain "kerfuffle" amongst the bloggers, check out MuD & PHuD where Tom Carroll writes:

"First, let me thank Jeff Goldstein at Protein Wisdom for his support and the link to yesterday's post (and also a thank you goes out to Bill at INDC Journal for the link). If anyone out there is interested in keeping your own property when a wealthy developer wants it, please spread the word and help us help these victims of governmental hyperpower in New London, CT.

Mary Katharine Ham of Townhall.com was kind enough to point me to a story done by The Insider Online that gives the background and brief bios of the homeowners involved. She also pointed to Institute for Justice, which is the organization who took this case to the Surpeme Court.

Multiple people have suggested joining the Castle Coalition whose stated goal is to fight unfair eminent domain claims by the government. Check out come of their success stories and become a member. Raven pointed me to a bit of potential good news, although I don't know whether or not it will help Susette Kelo et al."
Trackedback at Outside the Beltway and at Captain's Quarters, where there is a discussion about "The Mark Twain Option". Sue Bob's Diary weighs in also.

Update: Chicago Boyz has a great view entitled "The Danger of Kelo".

[] [] []

Sunday, June 26, 2005

Move America Forward

Video of Dick Durbin and the Blame America First Crowd from Move America Forward.

Alice Cooper Calls Bush a Pit Bull

Just another "anti-government punk rocker rebel libertarian" mouthing off. Arthur Chrenkoff reports on the story:
"INTERVIEWER: A lot of people in rock and roll, it's very fashionable to despise George W. Bush. That's not a view you subscribe to, is it?

"ALICE COOPER: Well, I think if you're in a war, you don't want a poodle in there, you want a pit bull. I don't think that you want a guy in there going, "Gee, I don't know. Maybe. Could be." I think you want a guy in there who's either going to win it or lose it."
Any doubts as to whom Alice was referring to as a "poodle"? Somebody French or French-looking? Chrenkoff adds:
"By the way, you have to be worried when a guy with too much mascara and a snake wrapped around his neck has a keener grasp of basic new millennium geopolitics than so many leading lights of the Democratic Party."
Tags:[]

Clintons Crash the Crusade

Basking In the Glory of Others

The Voice of America News is now reporting to the world about the historic final Billy Graham Crusade in New York City, that was crashed by the Clintons. Of the 80,000 people in attendance, it was "our Bill" who jumped upon the stage to share the glory of the aging evangelist. Who else could have gotten away with it, without being hauled off by "New York's finest"?
VOA News - Clinton Honors Reverend Billy Graham at Final US Revival Meeting: "Former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Senator Hillary Clinton, were among 80,000 people attending the second night of Christian evangelist Billy Graham's final revival meeting in the United States. Mr. Clinton greeted the 86-year-old preacher on stage Saturday in New York, telling Reverend Graham he is, in Mr. Clinton's words, 'a man I love.' The former president said the first Billy Graham crusade he attended was 46 years ago."
Trackedback at My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Billy Graham Endorses Hillary

The esteemed Evangelist Billy Graham says his "wonderful friend" Hillary Clinton, should "run the country". Lordy, Lordy, what's a happenin'?

Although the headline from AOL News reads "Clinton Honors Graham During Pastor's Last U.S. Crusade, in fact the Clintons were the ones winning the "honors", which is exactly what they went for. Where is the ACLU and People for Separation of Church and State? Oh, I forgot, separating religion from politics does not apply whenever democrats are the ones being praised, applauded and endorsed in places of worship. So there you have it folks, Billy's for Hillary Clinton for president. May he live so long!
"Graham called the Clintons 'wonderful friends' and 'a great couple,' quipping that the former president should become an evangelist and allow 'his wife to run the country.'"
Was this exploitation of the aging Reverend Graham, just another cunning political move by the Clintons? Or, as a Christian, was America's Preacher just "hanging out" with the morally bankrupt, in hopes of spreading the gospel, as Jesus commanded? Or, is the great evangelist only being true to himself, as he recently revealed to NBC's Katie Couric that he is a life-long Democrat? Take your pick. One thing we know for certain, there was "Bill Clinton", forever and always, "the corpse at every funeral, the bride at every wedding, and the baby at every christening."

Thanks to the sharp tongued Alice Roosevelt Longworth, daughter of Theodore Roosevelt, for the prophetic quotation.
Trackedback at basil's blog, Mudville Gazette and phin's blog.

Saturday, June 25, 2005

Al 'Pants-on-Fire' Franken

Al Franken, after becoming known from his performances on the comedy show "Saturday Night Live", attempted the writing of some books on comedy. Those books did not bring much success. However, Al Franken discovered that he could ride the road to riches and success on the coattails of current popular conservative political pundits and others by including their names in the title of a book. His first big success was "Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot". That book set the stage for his continuing attacks on conservatives, as it played into the hands of those on the left who had already coined the gratuitous smear which was Franken's choice of a title. Although totally without experience in political punditry, Al Franken became the "official expert" on Rush Limbaugh, whenever one was needed by the media, even though he had done no in depth research on Limbaugh, nor knew him personally. Franken then presented himself as the Liberal alternative to Rush Limbaugh, without apparent success. When the outspoken Bill O'Reilly topped the media charts, Franken again rushed to write another book hoping to once more glide to the Best Seller List while standing on the back of a popular conservative pundit. The repeated accusations in his books are that the subjects of the books are liars, one and all. Yet, he describes himself as someone who holds himself "to an impossibly high standard when it comes to telling the truth.' That statement may be the only "truth" that Franken has ever spoken or written, as obviously his "impossibly high" standard has been impossible for even him to reach. Alan Skorksi tells the truth about Al Franken and his "lying lies" in this forthcoming book. Skorski's book cannot be expected to be the big seller that Franken's books about George Bush, Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh have been, because Al Franken is not at all a peer to any of them. However Mr. Skorski is setting the record straight by telling the truth about Al Franken and his "lying lies and "smearing smears".

"... Pants on Fire: How Al Franken Lies, Smears And Deceives" by Alan Skorksi
"Skorski reveals that Franken himself regularly lies, smears, and distorts what others say and do, ultimately discrediting himself as a 'truth teller.' AVAILABLE OCTOBER 2005"

"Al Franken was a 'nobody' in the arena of political punditry before he wrote two best-selling books, Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot and Lies and Lying Liars Who Tell Them. Now one of the most prominent figures on the liberal Air America radio network, formed to counter the mostly conservative voice of mainstream talk radio, he consistently boasts 'I tell the truth' and 'I hold myself to an impossibly high standard when it comes to telling the truth.'

"Until now, says Alan Skorksi, Franken's continuous smears against his enemies while promoting himself as the 'ultimate truth teller' have gone unchallenged by the mainstream media. Surprisingly, even conservative or right-leaning media have not challenged the falsity of much of what he says, although Franken does not define what he believes is a lie, except to say that conservatives 'get away with it.' In contrast, Skorski defines a lie as 'intentionally telling an untruth with the purpose of trying to cover up or get away with something,' which he then accuses Franken of doing with impunity."
Tags:[]

Media Disinterest in Terrorist Trial

Are Arab Professors Masterminding Terror? If they are, apparently, few Americans and the rest of the world give a rat's patootie. In 2001, media critics scolded newspapers and Fox TV's Bill O'’Reilly for having "“an agenda"” when they were exposing these radical Middle Eastern professors. O'’Reilly in September 2001, challenged Al-Arian on his support of terrorism and a video in which he called for "“death to the Jews"”.

Now there seems to be "an agenda" of minimal coverage all over, and now most all are silent. Although, the New York Times is now uninterested about Al-Arian, three years ago (January 27, 2002) that same liberal mouthpiece was charging Governor Jeb Bush and the University of South Florida with dishonoring the "ideals of public universities by trying to fire Palestinian professor Sami Al-Arian whose anti-Israel statements have produced threats to campus and a decline in contributions."” On March 1, 2002, in an article in the New York Times by Nicholas Kristof, it was reported that Al-Arian "“denounces terrorism"” and "“promotes interfaith services with Jews,"” and the Times scolded that "“a university, even a country, becomes sterile when people are too intimidated to say things out of the mainstream. Three exhaustive studies of his conduct have found no evidence of wrongdoing."

From The Jewish Week of 6/24/2005, come this article, "Are Arab Professors Masterminding Terror?":
"Federal trial of alleged Islamic Jihad leaders receiving less-than-complete coverage up north. by Jonathan Mark - Associate Editor

"It has been called 'the most significant terrorism trial' since 9-11: the first time alleged leaders of Islamic Jihad, self-confessed killers of more than 100 Israelis and two Americans, are being tried in an American court; the first time the controversial Patriot Act has lassoed jihadists of this magnitude; and the first time that Arab professors in an American university who have claimed 'academic freedom' for their pro-Palestinians views have been indicted for using their university offices to direct and finance terrorist activity.

"Yet most New Yorkers are oblivious to this case because The New York Times, let alone most other northern newspapers, has decided not to cover the extraordinary testimony being heard now in a Tampa, Fla., courtroom."
For more information one must go to today's Tampa Tribute in Florida:
"Prosecutors on Thursday showed jurors a document linking an organization founded by Sami Al-Arian to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, pledging unity with another terrorist organization and glorifying an Islamic Jihad attack."
Finally, thanks to the Patriot Act and this trial, the University has found enough courage to stand up to the New York Times and to finally fire the professor, which will prevent him from further poisoning the impressionable minds of the young.
"USF Condemns, Fires Al-Arian, TAMPA - The University of South Florida fired Sami Al-Arian with a flurry of denunciations Wednesday, saying his federal indictment "confirmed" beliefs that he broke school policy and abused his role as a tenured professor."
Dr. Sanity describes this phenomena as "Beautiful Indifference" and compares it to the obsessive news coverage of the Scott Peterson and Michael Jackson trials.
Trackedback at WizBang Blog.

Friday, June 24, 2005

Kerfuffles from Friends

Here are some Friday kerfuffles from Friends of Kerfuffles. Enjoy.

Barking Moonbat Early Warning System writes, "The UAW is on course to kill GM. That’s not good for GM and surely not good for America."
Death Of An Automaker: The year was 1953. Dwight Eisenhower had just been elected President and was promising to build a national system of “interstate” highways to make transportation across America much easier and to provide easy access for national defense in light of the rising communism in Europe. General Motors executives brought a new phrase into American folklore when one of them stated, “What’s good for Genera Motors is good for America”.
The Museum of Left Wing Lunacy writes: MORON.ORG (MOVEON) says we are losing the war in Iraq:
"I dream of the day when conservatives refer to Moveon.org as MORON.ORG. We need to call these people what they truly are...MORONS. In their lastest e-mail sent out to their followers, MORON.ORG had this to say.."
Glen Dean at Nashville Truth writes about happenings in ... where else, but Nashville:
So Koran Desecration Is A Hate Crime: "Sometimes I think we should just surrender and change the name of our country to Amerabia. As reported in the Tennessean and discussed by Bill Hobbs and Donald Sensing, a Koran was desecrated in Nashville and the 20,000 Muslims who live in this hospitable southern city are all bent out of shape about it. But to make matters worse, the police are investigating the incident and consulting the FBI on the possibility of charging the person who did this with a hate crime. Just like I think that someone should have the right to burn the flag, I also believe that someone should have the right to burn a Koran, or a Bible, or the Torah. Why is the Koran suddenly so much more special than any of the other Holy Books?"
Ranten N. Raven is wondering Are You "In Good Hands" At Allstate?
Did they fire this man because of his faith?
An article at Worldnet Daily (sun source of Hillary's "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!") caught my eye. It reports that Allstate fired one man for an article he had written that stated his beliefs concerning homosexuality. Here's a link to it. The article was written at home, on his own time, and in no way affiliated him with Allstate.
American Daughter writes that Iran Is Different:
-- The threat to the United States from Iran is more urgent than that from other hostile foreign countries. "For twenty-six years, twenty-seven years these mullahs, the clerics ruling Iran, have just been extremely dangerous. ...what makes the mullahs different...they're terrorists and criminals." Popular conservative author Dr. Jerome Corsi spoke in a recent interview with personnel from the American Daughter Media Center.
Jackson's Junction describes How the Left Destroys our Great Nation:
"Pamela aka Atlas will provide as a public service, ongoing empirical evidence on how the Left Destroys our Nation. It's everyday, in a million different ways, in the minutia (see below) and on the global chess board (see every major MSM paper and network)........."
Charmaine Yoest at Reasoned Audacity is taking it to CNN today.
Media Advisory: I'm doing CNN today: Today at 5 pm EST your Audacious (yet so Reasonable), blogger is scheduled to appear on CNN to discuss a new campaign from the cable television industry called "Control Your TV."
ROFASix asks is Congress - Crooked or "Just" Ethically Challenged?
"It is extremely hard for Congress to break the law in Washington. They write the laws and don’t hesitate to tweak ‘em or reinterpret them if someone, particularly a party leader, should accidentally goof up and get caught breaking the law. That is why when Congress gets spotlighted with their ethics around their ankles, they rarely pay any consequences."
Don Surber in a post entitled Karl Rove Called Them *Gasp* Liberals asks;
"Did he call liberals losers as Reid called Bush? Did he imply that they are Nazis as Richard Durbin called our soldiers? Did he say their actions were like Genghis Khan as Kerry called soldiers in Vietnam?"

France Humiliates Oprah

Although, there has been an apology rendered, Oprah says she will be buying no more Hermes scarves. Wow, another great loss for the French! Now our dear Oprah can know how the rest of us "not so famous" Americans are routinely greeted by the French.

Now, if you or I, dear reader, were to attempt to enter the Hermes of Paris store "after hours", and you or I were turned away, we would consider it par for the course and not at all unusual. However, Oprah Winfrey and her ilk are not "you or me", and in fact, they do not like to shop where they may have to encounter and rub elbows with "you or me", or other proles. No, they are accustomed to doing their buying "after hours" and receiving special perks. So one can only imagine the humiliation it must have been, for the most powerful celebrity in the world, to be turned away from the Hermes of Paris store. Oh, the indignity of it all! One would have thought that poor Oprah had escaped those types of embarrassing slights, when she left the backwoods of rural Mississippi. But no, Paris, France was lying in wait for her, according to the story from the BBC.
"Luxury French boutique Hermes has apologised to talk show host Oprah Winfrey after refusing her entry to one of their outlets in Paris.

"A friend of Winfrey, who witnessed the incident, said it was 'one of the most humiliating moments of her life'. Hermes said a private PR event was being prepared so it was unable to accommodate the star at the time. A spokeswoman for the star's production company called it her 'Crash' moment, referring to a race relations film."

No wonder the clueless French shopkeepers did not recognise her; the BBC reports that her TV show is seen in "only" 112 countries worldwide! Obviously France is not a part of that world. Obviously also, Oprah and her 30 million viewers will not soon forget the regretful "Misunderstanding". The BBC quotes the fabulously wealthy woman as declaring, 'I will shop where people appreciate my business, and I don't believe that any longer includes Hermes'. If Oprah, in future, vacations where her business is appreciated - or at least where they watch her TV show, it will no longer include France, either. Go for it, Oprah girl! Take a stand for the women of America!

Trackedback at WizBang Blog and Mudville Gazette.

Tags:[], [], []

Thursday, June 23, 2005

The Truth About the Hillary Book

There is certainly something fishy about this book by Edward Klein. The timing is absolutely perfect - for Hillary's presidential campaign. The charges are so outrageous and impossible to verify, that no one can believe them. When the real truth about Hillary comes out during the campaign, it will be tarnished with the tainted brush of this book's accusations. Peggy Noonan, who has read the book, retitles it "Eine Kleine Biographie". What to do about it? Don't buy it! Don't dump on it! Don't quote the charges! That is their plan; that is what they expect conservatives will do, writes Peggy Noonan:
"In terms of political impact it is not a takedown but a buildup. Dick Morris says its sensational charges will only "embolden" her. They will certainly tend to inoculate her against future and legitimate criticism and revelations. The book is poorly written, poorly thought, poorly sourced and full of the kind of loaded language that is appropriate to a polemic but not an investigative work.

"Here are some significant things about Mr. Klein's book: It comes from an establishment journalist who's had his professional ticket punched at the New York Times magazine and Newsweek. He has no conservative bona fides; he says he is and appears to be essentially apolitical. This is an anti-Hillary book by the MSM. It has been heavily promoted not by a conservative publication but by Vanity Fair magazine, which published a big fat juicy chapter in its famous 'Deep Throat'; issue. Graydon Carter, Vanity Fair's editor, is the author of an anti-Bush book, passionately opposed to Iraq, and no one's idea of a wing-nut."
There have already been written good biographies of Hillary Clinton by Barbara Olson, Joyce Milton, Dick Morris, Peggy Noonan, and liberal David Brock. This Klein book is already a best seller, so there is obviously a big market for a Hillary biography. Ms. Noonan writes that Edward Klein's book was written to garner the dollars of a conservative market, but, as is usually the case with the media and with liberals, he has assumed that conservatives are stupid. Don't prove him (and them) right! Don't buy this book!

Read the real "honest-to-goodness" truth about Hillary here:
I have just read Michelle Malkin's good advice; "Leave it on the shelf." She quotes John Podhoretz of the "New York Post":
"This is one of the most sordid volumes I've ever waded through. Thirty pages into it, I wanted to take a shower. Sixty pages into it, I wanted to be decontaminated. And 200 pages into it, I wanted someone to drive stakes through my eyes so I wouldn't have to suffer through another word."
Outside the Beltway, The Strata-Sphere and Decision '08 have good comments on this subject. Trackedback at Basil's Blog.

Wednesday, June 22, 2005

Blair gives up on Europe

Tony Blair of England says that Europe, in its present state, is not worth fighting for.

Telegraph | News | Blair gives up on his EU dream:
Tony Blair has given up on Europe as an issue worth fighting for, senior allies of the Prime Minister have told The Sunday Telegraph.

A leading Blairite cabinet minister made the admission last night as the European Union descended into deeper turmoil, with doubts surfacing over the future of the single currency.

Tony Blair: ‘Africa is worth fighting for. Europe... is not
Expect Pope Benedict to be the next leader to give up on Europe.

What Does Harry Reid Think?

Senator Harry Reid, Democrat leader of the Senate said this about Senator Durbin's remarks comparing the military's Guantanamo Bay facility as ib a par with the Nazis, Soviet gulags and the killing fields of Pol Pot: "I stand by the statement he made", but, more importantly, the President's poll numbers are dropping! This is according to yesterday's Washington Times, Frist tells Durbin to apologize on Senate floor:
"As of last night, a story with the headline 'U.S. senator stands by Nazi remark' was still the second-most e-mailed story on the Web page of Al Jazeera, a network that the U.S. government accuses of spreading anti-American sentiment in the Arab world."

"Asked about the reaction to Mr. Durbin's comments and his apology, Mr. Reid said 'The statements made by Senator Durbin speak for themselves. I stand by the statement he made,' he said. 'We are not going to discuss this any more.' "

A Soldier's Memory Defamed

"War drew us from our homeland
In the sunlit springtime of our youth.
Those who did not come back alive remain
in perpetual springtime -- forever young --
And a part of them is with us always."
-- Author Unknown
In Virginia, in 1861, young men were called upon to defend their state under the Constitution of the United States. They responded valiantly, as had their fathers and grandfathers before, during the War of 1812 and the American Revolution. The young men of Virginia lost the fight. Their army was vanquished; their men slaughtered and maimed. Those that returned home weary and defeated, were met with the devastation that the war had wrought. All that was left of value to them, were their families, their honor and their pride. In each county throughout the South, it became a cathartic event for the community to honor its loved ones and neighbors who had sacrificed so much for the South, with a monument on the courthouse lawn to those Sons of the South.

There were many great men amongst those Sons, such as James Gregory Hodges, a soldier from Portsmouth, Virginia. Yesterday, the Confederate Monument to him and his comrades in arms was defaced by persons unaware of the sacrilege such an act signifies. It disgraces both the vandals and the community, as it is evidence of an ignorance of history and of the failure to properly educate the current generations. A people who allow the degradation of memorials to their own dead, show to the world and to themselves the shameless kind of people they are.

JAMES GREGORY HODGES was born in Portsmouth, Virginia, on the 25th day of December, 1828. His father was General John Hodges, one of the most noted citizens of his area of Virginia for his character, intelligence, wealth, social position and public services. He served as a captain in the War of 1812 and in the Virginia General Assembly. His mother was from a renown Virginia family and the granddaughter of the illustrious Revolutionary War patriot, Colonel Benjamin Wynn.

Hodges received a grand education at the once famous Literary, Scientific and Military Academy of Portsmouth. This school had a large number of cadets, of whom James Gregory Hodges was one. He chose medicine as his profession and graduated at the University of Pennsylvania. He gained great success and eminence in his profession. During the yellow fever of 1855, he gave untiring and faithful devotion to the sick from the beginning to the end of the epidemic. He was elected mayor of the city of Portsmouth on April, 1856, and again in April 1857. In 1856, the Third regiment of Virginia volunteers was organized in Portsmouth, and Dr. James Gregory Hodges was elected its colonel.

On Saturday, the 20th day of April, 1861, when the regiment was ordered by the Governor of Virginia into the service of the State, it consisted of the following companies: Portsmouth Rifle Company, Capt. John C. Owens; Old Dominion Guard, Capt. Edward Kearn; the National Grays, Capt. John E. Deans; the Marion Rifles, Capt Johannis Watson; and the Dismal Swamp Rangers, Capt. James C. Choat.

The following is from an address given by his brother-in-law, Judge JAMES F. CROCKER, before Stonewall Camp, Confederate Veterans, Portsmouth, Virginia, June 18th, 1909.
"The twentieth of April, eighteen hundred and sixty-one-memorable day! On this day commenced in Virginia an unproclaimed war. The ordinance of secession had been passed on the 17th, day of April, 1861. The proclamation of President Lincoln calling on Virginia for her quota of military forces to wage war against her sister States of the South brought all Virginians of true loyalty together. War was the inevitable result of national and State action. Gov. Letcher had sent down Gen. William B. Talaferro to take charge of the organized forces of this section when called into the service of the State. At noon the United States authorities closed the doors of the navy yard and began the destruction of its buildings, its ships and stores. It was an act of war and was so regarded by all. At 2 P. M. the volunteer companies of the city were called into the service of the State. At that hour the long roll sounded summoning our local military to arms. All who survive remember the profound interest and emotion of that hour. It stifled all light feelings and gave to each brow a thoughtful aspect, and to each eye a depth of light which arises only when the heart is weighted with great moving concern. Men pressed in silence each others hands and spoke in tones subdued by the solemnity and intensity of their inexpressible feelings. All knew that when the long roll once sounded, it would thrill the land, and that it would not ease to be heard, day or night, until silenced in victory or defeat. Our military responded to the roll call with a unanimity and with a patriotic devotion unsurpassed."
"I have fought a good fight
I have finished my course
I have kept the faith."
-- Timothy 2:4:7

Man of Aljazeera - Dick Durbin

"Finally", The Man of Aljazeera, Illinois Senator Dick Durbin Apologizes for Gitmo Remarks:
"Some may believe that my remarks crossed the line. To them I extend my heartfelt apologies."
It took Durbin, the Democrat's Senate whip, an entire week to decide whether he ought to rescind these words he used to describe the American treatment of potential terrorist detainees at the Pentagon run Naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
"If I read this to you and did not tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime Pol Pot or others that had no concern for human beings".
When called upon at the time to apologize to American troops in service to their country at the dangerous detention facility, Durbin refused, and, the very next day he reread his outrageous remarks to the Senate and demanded that President Bush be the one to apologize.
"This administration should apologize to the American people for abandoning the Geneva Conventions and authorizing torture techniques that put our troops at risk and make Americans less secure".
Republican Senators, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Vice President Dick Cheney, among others, condemned the comparison that Durbin made and noted that his false comments have endangered American troops even more. No Democrats found fault with Durbin's speech, and a number of them came to his defense, including the Democrat leader of the Senate, Harry Reid. Senator Reid blamed the troubles of Dick Dubin on the Republican "noise machine of the far right". Finally, on Tuesday, a fellow Democrat and fellow politico of Illinois, Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, said about Durbin's remarks:"I think it's a disgrace to say that any man or woman in the military would act like that."

A week later, now that Senator Durbin has been lionized in Aljazeera and all the media outlets of the Muslim world for his "frank" words, he has finally decided to apologize. How will he undo the harm done to America by those scandalous comments during the past week, when he and the Democrats were standing firmly by them?

Tuesday, June 21, 2005

How Will You Fare?

Monday, June 20, 2005

Doritos and Raisin Bran Crunch

Holy Piggly Wiggly again! What will Senator "Gitmo Dick" Durbin have to say about this outrageous treatment of an Iraqi detainee by his American captors? Senator Durbin called the Guantanamo Facility a "Nazi-Gulag, Pol Pot" prison because of the way the detainees were treated. Those at Gitmo are fed:
* Orange Glazed Chicken
* Rice Pilaf
* Steamed Peas & Mushrooms
* Fruit Roupee
Meanwhile, just out in "Gentleman's Quarterly", issue of June 20th, 2005, is another expose by American prison guards, revealing that detainee Saddam Hussein is fed Dorito chips and Raisin Bran Crunch. IndiaDaily.com is reporting:
For a time his favorite food was Cheetos, and when those ran out, Saddam would "get grumpy," the story says. One day the guards substituted Doritos corn chips, and Saddam forgot about Cheetos. "He''d eat a family size bag of Doritos in 10 minutes,"
This is real abuse! Subjecting a retired murderous dictator to this rotten diet is outrageous! One hopes those Doritos and Cheetos are not fried in lard. Just wait until Saddam and Amnesty International learn that the poor man is being deprived of "fruit roupee", whatever the heck that is. They will be on the phone to the Illinois Senator stat! The report comes via DRUDGE REPORT FLASH 2005

Could "Gitmo Dick" Survive?

Does anyone believe that Senator "Gitmo Dick" Durbin could survive the military's Survival School? Pictured is some of the treatment meted out by the American military upon its own members. Has Senator Durbin ever come to their defense or rescue on the Senate floor, as he has done for America's enemies?
"After several days of the war game -- evading the bad guys -- the students are captured. The students are then taken to a mock prisoner of war camp to begin the most stressful part of their training. To prepare commandos who are at high risk of capture, the course includes sleep deprivation and food deprivation -- severe enough that, over the course of survival school, a student typically drops 15 pounds."
If the U.S. Congress does not penalize Senator "Gitmo Dick" Durbin for his traitorous comments, here is an idea. Send him to SERE School, aka known in the military as Survival Training, and hope and pray that the mouthy Senator survives. All uniformed military, enlisted and officer, are required to train for about three weeks at the schools across the country. Why not a United States Senator? If Senator Durbin is fearful, probably the Republican that all Democrats love, Senator John McCain, could be called upon to accompany Durbin, and explain the reasons for all the experiences he would encounter there.

As there are different levels of Sere's courses, it would be necessary to select the one most appropriate to the experience of dealing with treacherous Islamist terrorists, whose stock in trade is faking civilian identities while exploding booby trapped bombs, and chopping off heads of Jews, Americans and infidels. These are the enemies that the American forces at Guantanamo must face every day. These same military people were recently slurred by Senator Dick Durbin as "Nazi-gulag, Pol Pots". The Army probably sends these guards to "Level C Training". This is where Senator Durbin should spend a few weeks if he ever wants to enter back into the good graces of the American people.
SERE Level-C Training
The department also teaches the SERE Level-C training course to soldiers who are in a high- risk-of-capture category, which includes Special Forces, Rangers and aviators. The course is designed to give students the skill to survive and evade capture or, if captured, to resist interrogation or exploitation and plan their escape. The course includes a classroom phase, a field phase and a resistance training laboratory which simulates the environment of a prisoner-of-war compound.
Trackbacked At Michelle Malkin's 'DURBIN WATCH: THE DRUBBING CONTINUES'.

Off With His Head!

Poor Jack! The only luck he seems to be having these days is that the guillotine has been outlawed. However, the way France has been "heading" lately, that efficient machine will soon be replaced by "the sword of Allah". Perhaps not. I am finding there may be hope yet for the French, after reading the events of this past week-end.

Who would have ever thought that the snobbish French media would be cheering the victory of Tony Blair and Britain against their own Exalted Leader - Jacques Chirac? That is what happened this past week-end in France. Charles De Gaulle wannabe, Jacques Chirac, was expecting a hero's welcome when he returned to Paris. After all, he had belittled the British Prime Minister's speech at the European Summit as a "pathetic" performance. Jacques probably thought he would be greeted by adoring crowds back home in Paris. However, as reported in "The Guardian", things evolved differently:
The Guardian | Chirac savaged over failed summit:
"As he awoke to a summer heatwave on Saturday morning, after a dawn flight from Brussels, Mr Chirac was instead greeted with headlines depicting him as the principal loser of the summit. Le Monde, the grand old tribune of France's intelligentsia, declared the summit a 'double victory' for Tony Blair. Downing Street officials could barely believe their luck as they read that Britain had buried the EU constitution and succeeded in highlighting the 'anomaly' of how the EU spends seven times more on farmers than it does on 'future' projects, such as science and research."
Captain's Quarters blogs:
"The problem comes from Franco-German blindness to the fact that most European countries don't want to tie themselves to a system that benefits the Franco-German center at the expense of their own economies -- among other worries about further integration. The Dutch have recently found out what multiculturalism might bring with the Islamist murder of filmmaker Theo Van Gogh, while the Eastern European nations have firsthand experience with the Socialist economic model and hardly want to support yet another country's pensions with their own GDP. Britain also falls into this latter category, even with its own social spending levels far above that of the US, for instance."

Iran's Democracy

In sympathy with the Iranian people, I am reprinting this editorial which appeared in Today's Opinion Journal of the Wall Street Journal. If it is not accessible there, Petroleum World has also reprinted the same article for the Iranian people in their quest for freedom.
Iran's 'Democracy'
A rigged election, no reformist victory.

Monday, June 20, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT

The most astonishing aspect of Friday's presidential vote in Iran is not that the elections will go into a second round but that Tehran managed to convince so many in the West that this is a real demonstration of democracy.

All power is held by Supreme Leader Ali Khameni, his Council of Guardians and the small clique of military officers and businessmen around him. The Council disqualified more than 1,000 candidates before the election, vetting only contestants who support the regime's ideological lines. The example of outgoing "reformist" President Mohammad Khatami, who presided over eight years of economic decline and worsening repression, has proven that the President cannot change anything against the Council's will.

The one number worth parsing in Friday's election is that of voter participation. Many Iranians had called for a boycott as the only way of showing resistance. Knowing this, the mullahs seem to have taken their usual election manipulations to another level. Intimidation by the Revolutionary Guards and the fact that proof of voting is needed for certain jobs and welfare payments have always pushed up turnout. Still, voter participation has steadily declined in the past few years to barely 50%.

But this time turnout was 62.7%, exactly the level Supreme Leader Khameni had predicted. "Something is fishy here," Patrick Clawson, who follows Iran for the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told us. Contradicting all reports about the mood in the country ahead of the vote, hard-line candidates received unprecedented support, while the main reformist candidate, Mustafa Moin, came in fifth. Mr. Moin also suggested the elections were rigged, but since the regime allows no neutral observers the real extent of fraud or Iranian discontent can't be known.

The runoff election will now have former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani facing hard-line Tehran Mayor Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who surprised Western observers by finishing second. Neither man is a moderate in any Western sense. Mr. Rafsanjani stood by the late Ayatollah Khomeini from the first day of the Iranian revolution and was in power as Iran promoted international terror and rounded up political prisoners. He is also the father of Iran's nuclear program and openly mused in 2001 that the Islamic world would need only one nuclear bomb to destroy Israel.

The temptation will be strong, especially in Europe, to consider Mr. Rafsanjani to be the regime's "pragmatist" and someone who can be trusted to agree to end Iran's uranium enrichment program in return for the right "economic incentives." But it's more accurate to read these election results as the regime's attempt to tighten its control and to present a united, hard-line front as it sprints to develop the bomb under cover of the talks.

Writing in The Wall Street Journal last week, Shirin Ebadi, the Iranian Nobel Peace laureate, warned the West against offering any concessions to the regime, urging Europe and the U.S. instead to help Iran's democracy movement by highlighting Iran's human rights violations. One day before the vote, President Bush finally reached out to the Iranian people:

"Today, Iran is ruled by men who suppress liberty at home and spread terror across the world. Power is in the hands of an unelected few who have retained power through an electoral process that ignores the basic requirements of democracy. . . . And to the Iranian people, I say: As you stand for your own liberty, the people of America stand with you." Unfortunately, Iranians are still waiting to hear from Europe.

Serial Dad of the Year

Larry King, 2005 Father of the Year

Congratulations to all the great fathers in America and I hope that yesterday was lovely for you and that you were properly honored by your families. The reason I am hoping that, is there is very little chance that any of "you" will ever achieve the title of national "Father of the Year". The competition for that is very keen, indeed. Two of this year's honorees by the National Father's Day Council were Larry King and Donald "you're fired, Ivana" Trump.
"National Father's Day Council Announces 2005 Father of the Year Honorees:

"National Father's Day Council Announces 2005 Father of the Year Honorees Wednesday June 1, 2:46 pm ET 64th Annual Awards Luncheon to be held Tuesday, June 14th at the Marriott Marquis in New York City

"NEW YORK, June 1 /PRNewswire/ -- The National Father's Day Council will honor four deserving fathers for their exemplary parenthood at the 64th Annual Father of the Year Awards luncheon on Tuesday, June 14th at the Marriott Marquis in New York. All charitable contributions from the event will benefit Save the Children's Tsunami Relief Fund. These exceptional fathers are each leaders in their own right, spanning a diverse range of professions, including:
  • - George Feldenkreis, chairman & CEO, Perry Ellis International
  • - Larry King, television talk show host, CNN
  • - Daniel Sullivan, firefighter, Men's Health / Father's Day Council All Star Dad
  • - Donald Trump, chairman and President, The Trump Organization"
Be grateful for the adoration from your own children and family, as you will likely never achieve the "Big Time Dad" status. For example, few of you could top this in your fatherhood roles! Larry King is now married to his seventh wife, singer/actress Shawn Southwick-King. From these seven marriages Mr. King has fathered five children, Andy, Larry Jr., Chaia, Chance and Cannon, and one stepson, Danny Southwick. Any other American fathers in the running now? More is found at (Warning - Adult Images!) "satire.myblogsite.com/blog" (satire.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/6/16/947505.html), where it highlights another one of Larry King's spectacular achievements; winning the Best Interviewer award for fifteen consecutive years, even as his ratings steadily declined.
"(June 16, 2005) The National Father's Council honored Larry King - a deserving father for his exemplary parenthood at the 64th Annual Father of the Year Awards luncheon.

"'Mr. King as a father periodically played a vital role at the crucial stages in the lives of his children, and the Council is pleased to honor him this year,' said Rich Wurtzburger, the chairman of the council.

"Larry King has been married seven times and fathered five children from various marriages. In addition, he has been a two time engagement loser. On September 5, 1997, King, then 63, married Shawn Southwick, 37. King, in his hospital gown, from a hospital bed at UCLA Medical Center, said 'I do.' The newlyweds honeymooned at New York's Cornell Medical Center.

"He began his stellar carreer in 1971 with an arrest for grand larceny. He pled no contest to one of 14 charges of passing bad checks ... (which he inadvertedly incurred to sustain an extravagant lifestyle) which had an unusual connection to Kennedy assasination.

According to The National Father's Day Council,
"it is a not-for-profit organization that strives to heighten the meaning and observance of Father's and Mother's Day, raise funds for philanthropic purposes and present Father of the Year / Outstanding Mother Awards to deserving mothers and fathers of high accomplishment in their chosen fields who have also exhibited enormous achievement as parents. The Council has donated close to $16 million over the past 25 years to charities affecting families nationwide. For more information on the Father's Day / Mother's Day Council, visit www.momanddadday.com."
Trackedback at basil's blog.

Will Durbin Be Punished?

Will Senator Richard "Gitmo Dick" Durbin be disciplined for slandering his own country during wartime and for having "given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof"? Last Tuesday, speaking on the floor of the United States Senate, this is what Senator Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, reported about supposed "atrocities" at the Pentagon run Guantanamo Detention Facility:
"... what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime -- Pol Pot or others -- that had no concern for human beings."
Since then, Senator Durbin has become the darling of Aljazerra and other middle eastern broadcast media and newspapers, who have been spreading his words throughout the Muslim world. The Nazis, the Soviet gulags and the killing fields of Pol Pot are considered the most monstrous and barbaric events of the 20th Century, and the Senator from Illinoise has proclaimed that the American soldiers at Guantanamo Bay are their equals. Those words of the Senator have done great harm to our country and have put the members of the American military in needless danger. No doubt, our young soldiers will suffer bloodshed and death in response to Senator Durbin's false claims, yet not one Muslim detainee at Guantanamo has lost his life, under the hands of our soldiers there.

Mark Steyn explains in The Chicago Sun-Times, Durbin slanders his own country:
"The senator from Illinois' comparisons are as tired as they're grotesque. They add nothing useful to the debate. But around the planet, folks naturally figure that, if only 100 people out of nearly 300 million get to be senators, the position must be a big deal. Hence, headlines in the Arab world like 'U.S. Senator Stands By Nazi Remark.' That's al-Jazeera, where the senator from al-Inois is now a big hero -- for slandering his own country, for confirming the lurid propaganda of his country's enemies. Yes, folks, American soldiers are Nazis and American prison camps are gulags: don't take our word for it, Senator Bigshot says so."
A comment to Kerfuffles by SFCHUD got me to thinking. Members of Congress have a very disagreeable habit of passing laws under which American citizens must live and then exempting themselves from those same laws. In the Constitution of the United States, under Amendment 14, the "most beloved" Amendment of Liberals, "Citizenship Rights" are addressed. Section 3 specifically addresses the members of Congress:
"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
That last sentence is interesting and I am not sure that I know what it means. Since its ratification in 1868, has the Congress already exempted itself from Amendment 14 of the Constitution? It has been said that members of Congress cannot be punished for anything said on the floors of their respective bodies. If Amendment 14, Section 3, is still in effect, does that mean that Senator "Gitmo Dick" Durbin will be punished? He certainly deserves to be held accountable for the harm of his outrageous slur about his own country. The citizens of that country demand to know.

Tracked back at Wizbang blog where there is a simple definition of "torture" as applied to Guantanamo, and Pirate's Cove where it is said that that Liberals "Fight against other Americans, rather then helping to defeat our enemy's."

Sunday, June 19, 2005

Father's Day Readings

Reasoned Audacity wonders "how long it will be before Father’s Day is relegated to the remainder bin of history". I think it will be a long, long time, as civilization cannot long survive without fathers.

In Pursuit of Princes

The Story of Father's Day

Happy Father's Day 2005

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Hope in Lodi? Maybe.

There is perhaps some hope that the Muslim community in Lodi, California sees The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) for what it really is, a clear and present danger to our Constitution and our way of life. The Muslim residents of Lodi are seeing that CAIR has no real concern with American-Islamic relations, but instead is in support of Islamist terrorists and terrorist-sponsoring organizations and groups in America.

On June 16th, 2005, the federal government indicted a father and son from Lodi, California on terrorism related charges. Immediately, CAIR came to the rescue, according to Anti-CAIR, charging:
“We have documented numerous reports of intimidating tactics used recently by some FBI agents. We’ve become disappointed and alarmed at reports of abuseby local FBI. There have been threats of deportation, telling someone they can't have an attorney, when the attorney was on the phone they wouldn't speak to the attorney."
What does LODI and its local Muslim Community think about CAIR's involvement in defending the alleged terrorists?
Lodi Muslim Mosque board member Nick Qayyum said he and many others plan to protest at the Sacramento office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations for its part in standing by two local spiritual leaders arrested on immigration violations -- Mohammad Adil Khan and Shabbir Ahmed. The two imams, as well as Khan's teenage son, were detained as federal officials investigated two other men suspected of having ties to terrorists. Hamid Hayat and his father, Umer Hayat, were arrested Sunday on charges of lying to investigators.

Qayyum said the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, shouldn't be defending the two imams, who he thinks have tried to take control of the local Islamic community. The imams have been controversial in part because they came to Lodi from Pakistan. More than 3,000 Muslims from Pakistan live in the Lodi area. The community has been divided in ... over whether the community should be led by outsiders or those who grew up in area. .... some local Muslims have called ... to protest CAIR's support of the imams."

Here Comes Idi Amin

Durbin rebuked on floor of Senate

On the evening of June 14th, 2005, on the floor of the United States Senate, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) was referring to an FBI report he had read on conditions at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility. Senator Durbin lamented the hardships of some cells detainees, such as having to hear loud rap music and suffering cold room temperatures. Senator Durbin, describing interrogators at the Pentagon's Guantanamo Bay Facility, said "you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime -- Pol Pot or others -- that had no concern for human beings. Sadly, that is not the case. This was the action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners."

In one swift instant the American military in service at Guantanamo were turned into the likes of the greatest monsters of the 20th Century. Everyone was outraged, with the exception of the Democrats, Aljazeera and Senator Durbin. Each time an apology was demanded, Senator Durbin stood by his remarks, flagrantly rereading them to the Senate. He even turned the tables saying that it was President Bush who owed an apology.
The Washington Times 18 June 2005: Mr. Durbin, in the process of being rebuked by Senate Armed Services Chairman John W. Warner, Virginia Republican, for "insulting" American troops, appeared on the Senate floor Thursday. Rather than apologize, he reread his Nazi-Soviet gulag-Pol Pot remarks and explained that he was only referring to interrogation techniques described in a letter by an FBI agent. He blamed the flap on the "right-wing media."
The Bush Administration is detaining about 520 potential terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. The Soviets murdered many millions of people at the Gulags. The Nazis exterminated 6 million Jews and others during the Holocaust. The Pol Pot regime flagrantly practiced human genocide. How in God's name, could anyone see a comparison between our current government's protective actions to that of the regimes of unparalleled cruelty and barbarism? The only weapon that could possibly be left in the arsenal of Senator Durbin is to call President Bush the epitome of Idi Amin.

It is outrageous that voters of Illinois would send this mean man to Washington to be a cohort of our enemies during wartime. It is outrageous also that the citizens of Nevada would send Senator Harry Reid, who came to the defense of the beleaguered Senator, describing him as a long time friend and blaming the "noise machine of the far right" for Durbin's troubles. Yes, - it's that "far right noise machine" once again that is the root of all evil, defending the honor of military men and women who selflessly stand in harm's way to protect this nation.

We ♥ GITMO!

According to information at The Campaign Store, where this "delightful" image is offered as a bumper sticker, the terrorists and suspected terrorists at the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility are treated better than U.S prisoners here at home who are jailed for less serious offenses. They give a typical menu for a detainee at GITMO as:
* Orange Glazed Chicken
* Rice Pilaf
* Steamed Peas & Mushrooms
* Fruit Roupee
By comparison, they state that American troops guarding the detainees at GITMO are served a vacuum packed MRE (Meals Ready to Eat). We do not not feed MREs to the suspected terrorists, because Congress has declared that would be considered “abuse”, according to The Campaign Store. They write that on the Muslim holiday of Ramadan the terrorists and suspected terrorists at Guantanamo are fed lamb with honey and dates and provided with prayer beads and prayer oil, all courtesy of American taxpayers. They quote Congressman Duncan Hunter as saying "if you did that for American GI's - if you had a call to prayer five times a day - the ACLU would sue on the basis that we violated the separation between church and state." Hattip to Dr. Sanity.

I would like to add my two cents worth regarding the myriad rules for handling of the Koran by the soldier guards. The requirement that the soldiers wear gloves when handling the "the Holy Book, of Islam", is because they are considered "infidels" and all "infidels" are "UNCLEAN". Therefore, the U.S. government is agreeing with the Muslims world-wide and the Koran that American non-Muslims are UNCLEAN. The same goes for the rule that American guards must handle the Koran with only their gloved right hand. This is catering to a belief of Muslims that the left hand is always considered unclean, and is the reason that they refer to other cultures and their non-Muslim enemies as "They of the Left Hand."

Trackedback at Wizbang.

The Nazi-Gulag Pol Pot Prison

Aljazeera has quoted Illinois Senator Dick Durbin as saying this about the American military at Guantanamo, Cuba: "you would most certainly believe this must have been done by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags, or some mad regime - Pol Pot or others - that had no concern for human beings." Senator Durbin has now offered "clarification" of his Nazi-Gulag-Pol Pot comment on his home page:
“More than 1700 American soldiers have been killed in Iraq and our country’s standing in the world community has been badly damaged by the prison abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo. My statement in the Senate was critical of the policies of this Administration which add to the risk our soldiers face.”

“I will continue to speak out when I disagree with this Administration.”

“I have learned from my statement that historical parallels can be misused and misunderstood. I sincerely regret if what I said caused anyone to misunderstand my true feelings: our soldiers around the world and their families at home deserve our respect, admiration and total support.”

The Mudville Gazette comments in Gitmo Dick Update II:
"'My statement in the Senate was critical of the policies of this Administration which add to the risk our soldiers face.'”

"Ironic that while the US hasn't executed anyone at Guantanamo or any of our other terrorist holding camps Durbin's comments (carried far and wide by Al Jazeera) were tantamount to a death warrant for some US Soldiers and Iraqis involved in combat with these swine."

Perhaps Senator Durbin will have a chance to read "No American 'Gulag" By Pavel Litvinov, appearing in today's "Washington Post". Today, The Mudville Gazette warns:
A word of caution to those who would toss accusations like "Nazi" and "Gulag" about with a certain degree of nonchalance: Those death camps were actually recent history, and the survivors are still with us today.
Senator Durbin - read these are comments from an actual prisoner, Pavel Litvinov, who was a "detainee" at an "actual Gulag".
"Several days ago I received a telephone call from an old friend who is a longtime Amnesty International staffer. He asked me whether I, as a former Soviet 'prisoner of conscience' adopted by Amnesty, would support the statement by Amnesty's executive director, Irene Khan, that the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba is the 'gulag of our time.'

'Don't you think that there's an enormous difference?' I asked him.

'Sure,' he said, 'but after all, it attracts attention to the problem of Guantanamo detainees.'"

Friday, June 17, 2005

Man of Aljazeero, Richard Durbin

Congratulations to the citizens of Illinois and their elected United States Senator, Dick Durbin, on his becoming the official "Man of Aljazero".

The websites that support the enemies of the United States and its struggles against Islamofascist terrorism have found a new hero, Senator Dick Durbin of the United States Senate. And no wonder! Here is a Senator who equates Japanese-Americans of World War II with the detainees at Gitmo. What an outrageous slur against an ethnic group that was wondrously patriotic, even under adverse circumstances during that "other" war! Go to any of the enemies' websites today and you will see praises on high to Senator Durbin, such as this one: Senator stands by Nazi remark on Aljazeera's web site.
ALJAZEERA.net: "A US senator has refused to apologise for comparing the actions of US soldiers at Guantanamo Bay to those of Nazis, while others have decried or defended the mandate and method used to hold prisoners there.

"US Senator Dick Durbin on Wednesday refused to apologise for comments he made on the Senate floor referring to Nazis, Soviet gulags and a "mad regime" like Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge in Cambodia."
According to the Aljazeera Network, Senator Durbin had no plan to apologize for the comments, and in fact had demanded instead that the President of the United States is the one who should apologize for "authorizing torture".
"Durbin did not plan to apologise for the comments, spokesman Joe Shoemaker said. 'This administration should apologise to the American people for abandoning the Geneva Conventions and authorising torture techniques that put our troops at risk and make Americans less secure,' Durbin had said in a statement on Wednesday evening."
CMI * Chiapas * IMC
"Senator Durbin's remarks do break significant positive ground on some points:

*A forthright acknowledgement by Senator Durbin that Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib are not "abuses", but torture
* An admission of Congressional impotence - the concentration camps are so secret that even the supine US Congress doesn't know where they are all located.
* An implicit admission of US hypocrisy in issuing its annual "human rights report"
Islamic Community Net (UPDATE: This link seems not to be working as of 6/18/2005.) The quotes in italics are Senator Durbin's words.
However, Senator Durbin's remarks do break significant positive ground on some points:

1. A forthright acknowledgement by Senator Durbin that Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib are not "abuses", but torture:

"I believe the torture techniques that have been used at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo and other places fall into that same category."

2. An admission of Congressional impotence - the concentration camps are so secret that even the supine US Congress doesn't know where they are all located:

"...the administration has detained thousands of individuals in secret detention centers all around the world, some of them unknown to Members of Congress. While it is the most well-known, Guantanamo Bay is only one of them."

3. An implicit admission of US hypocrisy in issuing its annual "human rights report":

"The United States, which each year issues a human rights report, holding the world accountable for outrageous conduct, is engaged in the same outrageous conduct when it comes to these prisoners."

4. Writing about the thousands of American Japanese who were imprisoned in US concentration camps during World War II, Durbin mentions:

"It took almost 40 years for us to acknowledge that we were wrong, to admit that these people should never have been imprisoned. It was a shameful period in American history and one that very few, if any, try to defend today."

Someone should inform Senator Durbin that support for the World War II concentration camps for Japanese citizens is thoroughly embedded in the antichrist Bush regime. Islamophobic bigot Daniel Pipes whom Bush designated for leadership of the congressionally-funded "US Institute of Peace" willingly defends those very concentration camps. And more.

Dear Senator Durbin

This is a letter to Senator Durbin from Commander Paul Galanti who was a genuine prisoner of war for seven years in North Vietnam. Paul Galanti was in uniform, serving the United States when he was captured, yet the treatment he experienced from his captors was far, far worse than anything happening to the detainees at Guantanamo, who are not POWs. They wear no uniforms, they are members of no army and they fight for no country. They are detained to prevent them and their cohorts from murdering innocent American civilians. Where were the Senator Durbins of the U.S. Senate when our POWs were being brutalized in Vietnam? Whose side were they on then, and whose side are they on now?
Letter to Senator Durbin:
"As one who was held in a North Vietnamese Prison for nearly seven years and whose definition of torture and bad treatment is somewhat at variance with yours, I deplore your senseless comments about alleged "barbaric treatment" at our terrorist detention facility at Guantanamo.

"Your remarks comparing Guantanamo to the regimes of Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot are outrageous. I tried to think of why a rational human being could make such an outlandish statement but I keep coming up short. I thought I'd seen it all when Howard Dean performed his infamous scream in Iowa but your diatribe yesterday eclipsed Dean's moment of Hannibal Lecter lunacy. And your moment of pique will be infinitely more damaging to members of our Armed Forces serving in harm's way.

"I noted, when searching for your contact information, that the first item Google came up with was al Jazeera's joy at your comments. You, sir, for having aided and abetted the enemy in time of war, have been relegated in my mind to the status of Jane Fonda and your colleague, John Kerry as contemptible traitors.

"I hope not too many of our valiant members of the Armed Forces have to suffer for your stupid comments. Shame on you.

"This is copied to to the Chicago Tribune's Letters Editor. It is blindcopied to my family members from Illinois and to several military blog groups to which I subscribe.

"Sincerely,
Paul E. Galanti
Commander, U.S. Navy (Ret.)
Richmond, VA
pgalanti@comcast.net
http://www.nampows.org/pgbio.html"

Ralph Nader

Nader's very unpleasant N-gagement

The Latest from Ralph Nader

Who is Louis E. Chimpstein?

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

The Magna Carta - 1215 AD

On This Day in History, June 15, 1215, the "MAGNA CARTA" was SEALED. At the time it was probably not understood what an earth shaking event was taking place. Today, the document is considered the Great Charter of Freedom for English speaking people. Its influence has now been spread upon the face of the earth to many lands and languages.
"Following a revolt by the English nobility against his rule, King John puts his royal seal on the Magna Carta, or 'Great Charter.' The document, essentially a peace treaty between John and his barons, guaranteed that the king would respect feudal rights and privileges, uphold the freedom of the church, and maintain the nation's laws. Although more a reactionary than a progressive document in its day, the Magna Carta was seen as a cornerstone in the development of democratic England by later generations."
Quite interesting it is that in this year, 2005 AD, almost 800 years after those English nobles wrote the great document of governance, in all of Europe, which now includes England, there cannot be found minds to equal those of seventh century England, nor even of the American colony of the 1770s. The "oh-so-superior" French and their leaders of today cannot create a constitution for the European Union to govern itself. Once again the French say "NON".
"For the French to say no to Europe is like the English saying no to beef or the Russians saying no to vodka. Or perhaps like the heart saying no to the body. The Dutch and French no are a terrible blow to the morale of true believers in political union, whose faith in the historical inevitability of their dream may never recover."
France Buries the Constitution
Magna Carta and Its American Legacy
Before penning the Declaration of Independence--the first of the American Charters of Freedom--in 1776, the Founding Fathers searched for a historical precedent for asserting their rightful liberties from King George III and the English Parliament. They found it in a gathering that took place 561 years earlier on the plains of Runnymede, not far from where Windsor Castle stands today. There, on June 15, 1215, an assembly of barons confronted a despotic and cash-strapped King John and demanded that traditional rights be recognized, written down, confirmed with the royal seal, and sent to each of the counties to be read to all freemen. The result was Magna Carta--a momentous achievement for the English barons and, nearly six centuries later, an inspiration for angry American colonists.
In 1956, the twentieth century's great leader, Winston Churchill, described The Magna Carta thus:
...here is a law which is above the King and which even he must not break. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it.
Here is an image of the original ancient document

Here is a translation of the Magna Carta

They Want Democracy!

Will Anyone Answer?
"Tell them we are ready for democracy": a Libyan dissident's message to Washington.

What is it with you countries? Ever since that Chimpster Bush has been elected, one podunk country after another thinks it should have freedom and democracy too. Well, just because we have it, Mr. Chimpster Bush, doesn't mean we have to share it with the rest of the world. These desert kingdoms and principalities don't have a clue about democracy. All they know is that they want it because we have it. They think we are happy. They think we are great. See, how you have misled the world, President Chimpster? You lied! We have freed Iraq, so that should be the end of this FEEDOM novelty. Enough Already! Right now Iranian citizens are clamoring for freedom and they want our help. They used to call us "The Great Satan", but since you have been in office, President Chimpster, they now think we are, "Santa Claus". You have really messed up this world! And Libya? Holy Piggly Wiggly! Tell them the truth if you have the guts, Mr. Chimpster Bush. Tell them that even though they think we are happy, that we are not. Tell them how they cannot really understand how to run a democracy. Tell them that Freedom is not all it is cracked up to be. Tell them that it takes Americans twenty minutes just to decide which toothpaste to buy. That is what comes of freedom - too damn many choices. We should not force our personal beliefs onto others and make them as miserable as we are. Tell it like it is! They only want democracy because they do not have it. Look at us! We have it, and we don't even know we have it, because we are spending all of our time making choices. We have no time left to think about such things as freedom and democracy..

Mr. Chimpster President - When they call, just DON'T ANSWER the phone! When they
say they are ready for Democracy, tell them to eat cake. It's that simple.

Trackedback at Wizbang and basil's blog.

Dueling Doctors

The diagnosis is officially in! The sane doctor has diagnosed the crazy doctor to be nuts. In medical jargan it is said that poor Dr. Howard Dean suffers from a serious social dysfunction known as "impairments in insight". Dr. Sanity said so! The official diagnosis has been illustrated by detailed medical imaging (cartoon).

American Daughter Blogs Iran

I wonder how many people in the U.S. know when the War on Terror actually began. It was about twenty-five years ago in the days of Jimmy Carter when the Shah of Iran was toppled and American hostages taken. Since that time until September 11th, 2001, the Islamo-fascist movement had been tolerated as just another fly in the ointment of civilization. For a while, the free world was much too busy fighting the evil of communism, which was attempting to enslave the human mind and heart. God bless us, we had strong leaders who came forth such as Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher and Pope John Paul II, and we won that battle.

Yet after the threat of Communism passed, we downsized our fighting machine and hoped for world peace, believing the myth that such was possible. The Muslim terrorist movement continued striking our military, our citizens abroad and at home, and wherever they could. We threatened legal action, nothing more. The battle was finally joined on a summer day in 2001, when President Bush did NOT send in a team of lawyers to avenge the deaths of so many thousands of our citizens. Now we fight "mano-a-mano" these murderous gangs of thugs - the Islamo-fascists. The Holy Koran is their "Manifesto" and reading it literally, they follow its teachings to kill all infidels and Jews. For twenty-five long years the people of Iran have been living under leadership of these religious maniacs. Most of the Iranian people yearn for democracy and freedom here on earth, far more than they want seventy-two virgins in heaven. They need help. Share the blessings of freedom to all of God's children. If you can, read the stories of modern life in today's Iran at American Daughter Media Center. Discover how very fortunate you are to live instead in a land founded upon Christian principles of justice and humanity. Warnings - the stories and pictures are gruesome, for example:
"Shifteh Speaks (In English)--Popular Iranian singer Shifteh speaks out against the tyranny of the mullahs. She urges freedom and democracy for the people of Iran. She warns her listeners not to be deceived once more by Rafsanjani's lies and deceits. You can read the transcript of her speech or watch the video

"Plucking Eyes
-- The practice of plucking eyes as a form of punishment was introduced by the sadistic Islamo-fascist mullahs when they seized power in Iran in 1979.

"A Cry From The Heart--" When the mullahs stone hundreds women they stone me. When the mullahs cut the hand of the student, they cut my hand." This is a passionate plea from an Iranian woman. Watch the video or just read the transcript of her speech ..."
An American Daughter! What a great defender of justice and liberty to have on one's side.

Trackedback at Wizbang on 8 July 2005

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Microsoft Censors Blogs

Only in China -- for now. Just a wee bit of censorship. It is more important to get out the message. Remind me again, what message is that? A little censorship here. A little censorship there. Not a big thing. Few will even notice that words such as 'freedom', 'democracy' and 'demonstration' are seen no more. Who will ever remember the meanings of the values of 'human rights' and 'independence' if the words describing them are banned? The rights for which the blood of patriots has been spilt will become rare antiquities of bygone times. These are the American values that "some" American companies are passing along to the world? Find your pocketbook and close it shut to Yahoo and Microsoft, Mr. and Mrs. American Consumer.

Remind these so-called "multi-national" corporations just where they would be today if it were not for values such as freedom which have allowed them to become so successful. For any Internet corporation to ban the very values that it exploited for its own success is the height of hypocrisy. The world is watching.

BBC NEWS | Technology | Microsoft censors Chinese blogs

Monday, June 13, 2005

Send a Message to Michael

Did they run out of rockets, or did they all land on the Sun? Comrade Tovarich wants to know!
"InakaYabanjin: Were the Rockets Shot into the Sun?:
Wednesday, May 25, 2005

This is just a brief post to mark the passing of one of my favorite weblogs, Shooting Rockets at the Sun, which has apparently been taken down. For two or three weeks now, I had been hoping it was all just some kind of Blogger error, but one that drags on for that long? Not likely, so the writer(s) of it must have taken it down, thus depriving the world, or at least this reader, of a bit of political input but mainly entertaining and personal anecdotes (so refreshingly apolitical!) and observations as well as intriguing thoughts and stimuli. And the Sherman Hemsley post that really started it all for me? I'm still speechless in awe.

It's not to much to say that the blog was, 'Movin' on up,' and ,'[It] finally [was about to get] a piece of the pie.'

The weblog's main writer would surely be happy to hear that I recently spotted a new women's bag with a few faux luggage tags painted onto it, one of which read 'Kiss my grits!'"
Kerfuffles expects that it is even worse. Michael is probably on hiatus somewhere writing the Great American Novel.

CA125 Bood Test Hoax

Having just received a forwarded e-mail of the CA125 Blood Test Hoax, It must be time to remind readers to check out the real scoop that was posted at Kerfuffles on Friday, April 22, 2005.

CA125 Blood Test Hoax

The New Lebanon

France, under leadership of Jacques Chirac:

On March 8, 2005, tens of thousands of French high school students attempted to march peacefully through central Paris to show their disapproval of new education reforms announced by the French government. Such is the manner that civilized democracies give voice and freedom of speech to their citizens. However, the France of today, with President Chirac at the helm, seems to be falling into an anarchy brought about by religious and racial hatred of its people, one for the other. Yet these grievous failures at governance seem not to hinder the haughty French from lecturing other western democracies on shortcomings and failures, seen in the eyes of the French. As the peaceful young demonstrators marched, they were mugged by bands of black and Arab youths--about 1,000 according to police estimates, who were motivated by racial hatred of the native French, whom the attackers slur as 'little French people.' An 18-year-old dual citizen of France and Tunisia, was proud, explaining that he joined the mob just to 'beat people up,' especially 'little Frenchmen who look like victims', and described 'a pleasant memory' of repeatedly kicking a student who had fallen on the ground. The 'little whites', as described by the hooligans, do not know how to fight and 'are afraid because they are cowards'. The prime motive of the mob was to take 'take revenge on whites", and any Arab who 'has a French mindset', is also considered a 'little white'.

Where were the prestigious Gendarmes? Oh, they were standing guard all right, but, according to "The Weekly Standard"s article, "Mugged by la Réalité", the French police did nothing to protect the innocent citizens,
Colpart, who is active in anti-racist causes, confirmed that "these were racial assaults," and the attackers used "far-right slurs, violent and racist." One black student he saw come to the defense of a fellow student under attack by three blacks was called "a white sellout" by the assailants. Some scores of victims were taken to hospitals. Those who were interviewed confirmed that they had been caught up in an "anti-white" rampage and that the cops did nothing to protect them.
The world continues to turn upon its axis and countries, civilizations and peoples continue to rise and fall. Europe was a Muslim land and seems to be returning to such again. This time France begins the metamorphisis, becoming the New Lebanon, while the Old Lebanon gives a try for democracy. There is really nothing new under the sun, is there?

In Flanders Fields 2003

The Death of France's Multiculturalism

Hat Tip to Yoel Natan, Trackbacked at basil's blog.

A Clump of Cells

Seems that everyone has got a religion, the differences are in the various beliefs of the religions. The need to believe in something, whatever it is, must be engraved upon our DNA. Look at this explantory cartoon and see if you do not agree. Brilliant work by Doug TenNapel. And notice the response it elicted. Some cannot face the logic of truth. A Clump of Condor Cells

Saturday, June 11, 2005

Feminism Never Killed Anyone?

In my opinion, Dr. Pat Sanity is one of the best bloggers in the Blogoshere. She blogs very incitefully on Islamofascism and the War on Terror. Her opinions are certainly to be respected, especially considering her qualifications with the military and with medicine. Of course, as a woman, she is an expert on being one, and she often blogs on feminism, the woman's movement and women's rights. A reader left a comment at Dr. Sanity's blog that was just too much for me to ignore. Can you believe this?
Comment by MATT: "Feminism as a movement never killed anyone, not one person - can't we focus our energies on things that actually result in death and destruction not just frustration and anger?"
How about this, Matt? In 1973, the Feminist movement circumvented the state legislatures and created abortion on demand as a constitutional right in our country. Since then more than 40 million truly innocents have lost their right to life at the hands of those who, by nature and by calling, should have been their protectors. "Feminism as a movement never killed anyone, not one person - ..."? Please ...!
I Believe in the Sanctity of Life.

Trackedback at Wizbang's CARNIVAL OF THE TRACKBACKS, XV

Mob Rule at the Beach

Here is a new type of "suburban" crime I've not heard of before. Today, hundreds of sunbathers and beach-goers lying lazily on an Atlantic shore, were attacked by a large mob of about 500 unruly youths. Local police in riot gear arrived but were confronted by the gangs and were unable to completely restore calm. Reinforcements were called in from a neighboring town and they too were unable to disperse the mob, as the hooligans continued their muggings and refused to depart the beach. This mass attack on a popular beach was unprecedented said municipal authorities. Amazingly, this occurred in the sleepy suburbs of Lisbon, Portugal, a country and people unaccustomed to such atrocious behavior by its youth. BBC NEWS | Europe | Portugal youths in beach rampage

Although Portugal is a calm and peaceful place, its police force is not on a par with the rest of Europe. When the law enforcement arm of a society is too weak to perform its mandate of protecting that society, the mob rules. The lesson can be applied on all scales of events, even worldwide. Without the United States and its professional law enforcement, including its military, the Islamic terrorists would be taking over our society, en masse, and our neighbors, Canada and Mexico, would be about as much help as the neighboring suburb Cascais was to Carcavelhos, Portugal. Without the strong arm of vigilant defenders, "the mob rules", whether that mob be a band of teenagers, or a barbarous cult of murderers.

Tags:[]

Friday, June 10, 2005

Who Said This?

"They are sending their kids to Duke University and Yale University ... while they are sending someone else's kid to do a suicide bombing," was a quote in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, under the headline "Witness: USF prof tried to recruit me to join Palestinian Islamic Jihad".

The preceding was said in court testimony in Tampa, Florida by Muneer Arafat, about Sami al-Arian, who he claims tried to recruit him to join a militant faction of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

This should be a message to Muslim families worldwide. Using the religious teachings of the Koran, Arab Muslims are effective at convincing the children of ordinary Arabs to become weapons of human destruction by performing suicide bombings. However there are many Arab families of means who are aware that this is happening and choose to send their children away to Europe and America, so that they would not be tempted to march in the way of Allah.

One has to wonder, how many children of Palestinian or Arab leaders have been so devoted to the cause of Islam that they have encouraged their own children to martyre themselves? How many, instead, have sent their own children abroad to escape the nightmare of living up to the expectations of Allah and the Koran? Think on this, Mr. and Mrs. Ordinary Muslim. While you are sending your beloved child off on a murder/suicide mission, the children of those leaders whom you revere, are studying at Universities in foreign lands to become doctors and lawyers. Their children are seemingly much too valuable to Allah to be sacrificed on the alter of religious hatred.
Trackedback at Mudville Gazette, and Outside the Beltway.

Thursday, June 09, 2005

Bryd is Born Again

"Hyer me all you Evangelicals out there! Hyer me." ~~Senator Robert Byrd

Be it ever so curious that our American lawmakers exempt themselves from the rules, regulations and laws that the rest of us have imposed upon us by those same anoited ones. In this day and age, we can include the judiciary branch of government as lawmakers too, as that is what they end up doing all too often. All over the country schools and governments are prohibited from having any mention of religion lest they be breaking some obscure rule known as "separation of church and state". Yet in the United States Senate, a Solon can expound for hours on end about religion, just as Senator Robert Byrd did last month.

He claimed to be "born again" at the Missionary Baptist Chruch at Crab Orchard, West Virginia. Praise the Lord that the term, "born again" is not meant literally, as the thought of the reincarnation of Senator Byrd for another generation in Washington is too much to bear. Here he is preaching a sermon on the Book of Esther from the Old Testament of the Holy Bible right on the Senate floor. You can hear the audio from RadioBlogger. This man knows his Bible! Somehow he sees those who oppose the filibuster as likely to be strung up at the same gallows as were those "wormy Hamanizers" who stirred up trouble thousands of years ago in the Book of Esther. Or is it the Democrats on the gallows? Who knows - who cares? If this audio does not convince you of the need for "Term Limits" in the Congress, nothing will. Come on, West Virginia - carry this man back to his "almost heaven" home. But until the mountaineers do, you can always get your Bible lesson right on the floor of the United States Senate from Reverend "Born Again" Byrd. Hat tip to Jeff Blogworthy.com:

"Robert Byrd's wacky homily on the Book of Esther to justify filibuster

I first heard of Byrd's rambling eisegesis (antonym of "exegesis"... don't mean to jargonize, this is the only appropriate word) of the Book of Esther tonight on the Hugh Hewitt Show. It truly has to be heard to be believed - words fail me. Byrd uses the Bible to rationalize the unprecedented Democrat filibuster of Bush's judicial nominees. Go to RadioBlogger.com and look for the "byrdesther" link to listen to the mp3 file. Update: It is getting hard to find, so here is a direct link - with apologies to RadioBlogger for leaching."
Trackbacked at Basil's Blog, and Don Surber.
Tags:[]

Healthcare Cautions

Yesterday, David Asman wrote, from recent first hand experience, an outstanding comparison of the British health care sytem and the American, "There's No Place Like Home - What I learned from my wife's month in the British medical system". His wife had a stroke while the two of them were vacationing in England and spent months in the health care systems of both countries.
"When I covered Latin America for The Wall Street Journal, I'd visit hospitals, prisons and schools as barometers of public services in the country. Based on my Latin American scale, Queen's Square would rate somewhere in the middle. It certainly wasn't as bad as public hospitals in El Salvador, where patients often share beds. But it wasn't as nice as some of the hospitals I've seen in Buenos Aires or southern Brazil. And compared with virtually any hospital ward in the U.S., Queen's Square would fall short by a mile."
Today Michelle Malkin has a post entitled "THE NIGHTMARE OF HILLARYCARE" where she includes a post about the tauted Canadian Health system. Good reading both.
Two cautionary tales:
-David HaLevi on the Canadian health care system's deadly consequences
- David Asman on the British health care system's shortcomings
As you read both these cautionary tales, do not fall into the trap of believing that socialized medicine is totally ineffective. I agree with Michelle that "Hillarycare" would be a disaster and most Americans were smart enough to realize it. However, we already have various forms of socialized medicine in effect in the U.S. I myself have been given a choice and I have opted for socialized health care. I am happy with it, yet I would not want the entire country under such a plan, as then I would have no other options in instances where I want different care. It would also eliminate competition, and competition, as we all know results in superior options for everyone. Professor Jacob S. Hacker of Yale University laid out a plan labeled "Medicare Plus". It simply expands on Medicare to create a system that provides universal coverage while allowing choice, access and flexibility. Here is Jacob S. Hacker's presentation "Medicare Plus: Increasing Health Care Coverage by Expanding Medicare".

Tags:[]

Bye-Bye Maxine

Remember a few weeks ago at a congressional hearing ultra-Leftist Maxine Waters questioned Justice Department Counterterrorism expert Barry Sabin about Christian religious organizations in the U.S. raising money for terrorists:
Waters: "Do you have conservative religious organizations in the United States who supply resources to the Taliban?"

Sabin: "I don't know what you're specifically referring to."

Waters:
"Well, I'm talking about Pat Robertson and some of the organizations that were involved with support of the Taliban before 9/11, and I'm told that still there may be some connections to them." (from Jeff Blogworthy.com)
Californians - If you vote in the 35th California Congressional District - Get on the bandwagon! Even if you don't live there, YOU can help throw a gigantic Going Away Party for Representative Maxine Waters. Ending sixteen long years of the reign of Congresswoman I've-Got-A-Right-To-My-Anger Waters should be cause for jubilation indeed. My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is reporting:
"we’ve got a Milblogger in Iraq, Rusten Currie, who is going to challenge none other than * spit * Maxine Waters * spit * for her seat in Congress! YESSSS! Go read his blog, and help him out! Not only is it time for Rep. Waters to be sent packing, how great would it be for an Iraq war veteran to be elected to Congress? Here’s how you can help CURRIE FOR CONGRESS right now."

Lieutenant Rusten Currie is currently serving in Iraq and cannot officially or legally campaign until he is released from active duty. So give him a hand. Lieutenant Rusten comments:
I am legally prohibited from actively campaigning while I am on this lovely excursion to the cradle of civilization. However , my campaign team, and volunteers are not prohibited from raising money, and getting my message out. While I can’t directly comment on issues, my wife and temporary campaing manager is an author on my blog, so what is said by her on the sight (and my campaign site) is basically coming from me. I have read and continue to read the DoD policy on what I can and can’t say or do while I am in uniform. I won’t break or bend any laws, but I will continue to get my intent out there and I will get my parties nomination for this election. Thanks for reading and Thanks for blogging!!!
Cheers, Comment by Rusten Currie
The Indepundit writes:
MILBLOGGER RUSTEN CURRIE, currently serving in Iraq with the 4th Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, is running for Congress. Against Maxine Waters. God help her.
Maxine Waters was quoted as saying
"I have a right to my anger, and I don't want anybody telling me I shouldn't be, that it's not nice to be, and that something's wrong with me because I get angry." ~~Maxine Waters, 1989
Tags:[]

Wednesday, June 08, 2005

Dean Drives Christians from the Party

FOXNews.com - Politics - Dean Defends Criticism of GOP: "Dean told a forum of journalists and minority leaders Monday that Republicans are 'not very friendly to different kinds of people; they are a pretty monolithic party. ... It's pretty much a white, Christian party.'"

Fox News is reporting that during the last Presidential election that, in reality, the Democrat party was the party of Christians; 52% of Christians voted for the Dems and only 48% for the Republicans. Seems like the Dems and their chairman, Howard Dean, really are serious about driving the Christians out. The Republicans are waiting with open arms for the remaining American Christians. Or, could it be true, that Howard Dean is a Republican plant?

Diamonds In the Rough

Maybe you are really a diamond in the rough. With today's technology, upon your demise, you could become a diamond to decorate your grandchild's latest piercing. SPIEGEL ONLINE is reporting on the latest trend: "Diamonds Are Forever: Forget a Coffin -- Wear Grandma on Your Finger".

These diamonds, made from human ashes, are gorgeous and are just as valuable as the real thing. Actually, if it is your mother that is the diamond, then it will be priceless. No two stones are alike and the sizes range from 0.25 carats to 1.0 carat. The cost to produce the gem is about the same as the going price for a traditional funeral, and may even be less if one is planning a burial, which includes a plot, coffin and headstone.

The hue of the stones range from very light to deep blue depending upon the chemical make-up of the "dearly beloved". Vegetarians produce a lighter diamond than meat-eaters, but there is no way to predict the color your deceased loved one will produce due to environmental factors, nutrition and genetics. Now that cremation is in, it seems certain that memorial diamonds are the future. Grandmother never looked this good!
Christa Nachtigal, a 47-year-old Berlin resident, thinks so, too. In a few weeks, she will be wearing her recently-deceased mother as a necklace. "I don't look at it as hanging a dead person on a chain," she says, matter-of-factly. "For me, this diamond is pure, just like my mother was pure." Plus, she says, by transforming her mother into a diamond, she can keep "Mutti" close. "I don't just want to carry her in my heart. She deserves more. She deserves to be carried on my heart," Nachtigal says.
So how does one go about transforming human corpses into diamonds? There are two major memorial diamond firms -- the older LifeGem in America and the newsly established Swiss firm Algordanza, and they both use the same technique to create their jewels. The process seems quite simple. The carbon inside human ashes is captured and then heated to temperatures high enough to transform the carbon into graphite, which is then pressed into a ... VIOLA! ... diamond.

Neddy Kerfuffles is of the old school and thinks the only real place for dead bodies is in the ground. "Ashes to ashes, dust to dust", instead of ashes to diamonds, but not everyone will agree with such old fashioned beliefs based upon the first book of the Old Testament.
"In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." (Genesis 3:19)
Trackedback at Mudville Gazette.

Whites Only, Says Howie Dean

"It's pretty much a white Christian party." ~~Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean.
Trey Jackson has the video! Watch the MPG file HERE.

"Howard Dean appeared on Good Morning America this morning and was asked whether he really thought that republicans were only white christrians.

Dean: "It's true."

You can watch the video HERE."
SFGate.com has even more detailed audio of Dean's outrageous comments. You can hear him joke "just between us, eh". Is he that naive?
"In S.F., Dean calls GOP 'a white Christian party'
In this 4 min. 48 sec. excerpt from Howard Dean's remarks Monday in San Francisco, Dean responds to a question from reporter Portia Li with the World Journal about a poll showing a slide in support for Republicans among Asian and women voters. ... Later in the roundtable interview, Chronicle reporter Carla Marinucci asks a follow-up question about Dean's recent aggressive tone toward the GOP."
Howard Dean, described the Republican Party as unwelcoming to anyone but white Christians. The liberal Philadelphia Inquirer (bypass registration through BugMeNot) says the Democratic party is a “ball of confusion.” The site unpartisan.com has links to Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean defending his words today, including his comment that the GOP is "pretty much a white, Christian party." However, in the U. S. Congress, Dr. Dean is receiving few accolades according to The QandO Blog, where they are reporting "More Dems distance themselves from Dean".
"House Democratic leaders yesterday distanced themselves from Howard Dean’s fiery rhetoric, saying that the outspoken Democratic Party chairman’s recent controversial statements do not speak for them. House Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer (Md.) yesterday said Dean was not speaking on behalf of the party when he made those comments."
Captain's Quarters reminds of us Howard Dean during the last election when Al Sharpton skewered him on the race card. The Captain is writing that Howard Dean is continuing to self-immolate as the DNC chair.
"This last charge is hilarious coming from Dean. Recall, please, what started the Dean collapse during the 2004 primary race. Dean came to the Iowa caucuses as the acclaimed frontrunner by raising prodigious amounts of money, thanks to Joe Trippi and his visionary outreach. He had the momentum and had captured the imagination of the party. The Iowa caucuses were expected to anoint him as the dragonslayer against the hated George Bush. Then the Iowa debate came on January 11th, and it all slipped away -- and race was his Kryptonite, and Al Sharpton his Lex Luthor."

Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Bush Bashed by an Angel

According to the biography of "Voice of an Angel", Charlotte Church, "When she met President George Bush Jr. and told him she was from Wales he asked her in which state Wales lies." Apparently this 2001 event left such an impression upon the young soprano, that it is included at web sites about her. The American President, a native of the great state of Texas, asks this oh-so-charming angel, just where in the United States is Wales, and she believes that proves he is an ignoramus. Guess what Charlotte angel? We have more places named "Wales" in the U.S. than would probably fit in that tiny little appendage on that tiny little island lying off the coast of France. It is quite interesting that the very anti-American and anti-Bush British media, BBC, when describing the event at the time it actually happened, never reported on the President's comments to "The Voice of an Angel".

GIGWISE.com | Charlotte Church Blasts George Bush And Pavarotti: "Welsh opera star turned pop singer Charlotte Church has spoken about her meetings with American President George Bush and legendary heavyweight Luciano Pavarotti.

"Church revealed that Bush’s geographical knowledge is somewhat lacking when she met him after performing for former leader of the United States Bill Clinton. Talking to Glasgow station Clyde1, she said, “Clinton was lovely, in tune with everyone else, but George Bush just hasn't got a clue what he's doing. He asked me what state Wales was in. I said: 'It's its own country next to England, actually Mr Bush.' If he doesn't know the rest of the countries in Europe, he could at least know what's in his own country. He's a right weirdo.'

"The Voice Of An Angel star also spoke of an incident with Pavarotti when she was due to perform with the Tenor: 'He was horrible, really nasty. He was a pig and I was supposed to do a duet with him. He was like, 'You have to sing the mezzo.' I said: 'I am a soprano. How am I supposed to sing the mezzo?' And he said: 'You don't sing with me then.' He sent me out of his dressing room. I was only 15 - devastated. Pavarotti is a big fat diva.'

"Church’s ‘Crazy Chick’ single is out June 27."
Yes, indeedy, we are all going to run right out the door on June 27th, to buy the "Voice of an Angel", singing now as a "Crazy Chick". NOT!

Angel Charlotte must be one lovely mannered young Welsh lady to describe her erstwhile singing partner Pavarotti as "a pig and a big fat diva". Her on-line biography brags about her audiences with the Queen, Bush, the Pope and Clinton, and then she goes on to bash the first two. Of course, everyone knows that Angels always love the Pope and Bill Clinton.

In the course of her musical career, Church has sang for Pope John Paul II, Bill Clinton, George W Bush and the Queen. When the Queen met Charlotte Church she asked, "Do you sing often" and Prince Philip replied "Elizabeth, don't you know who this girl is? We listen to her on Classic FM all the time." Even better, when she met President George W Bush he asked her what state Wales was in!
Charlotte, honey, President Bush was probably wondering whether it was the Wales, Texas in his home state, or the Wales in either the states of Connecticut or Massachusetts, where he attended college, or the Wales in Iowa, or the Wales in Kentucky. But then again, no one expects a "singing angel" to understand the breadth of American geography.

Trackedback at Mudville Gazette and Wizbang's CARNIVAL OF THE TRACKBACKS, XV

Liberals Define a Hero

as someone lacking in personal character who acts in his own self interest instead of paying the price of his heroism; as someone who speaks anonymously in the shadows instead of to a grand jury or to the voters. That is the definition of Mark Felt, aka "Deep Throat", according to Brendan Miniter's OpinionJournal "Hero or not, Mark Felt did America a great service", June 7, 2005.

Miniter writes that Mark Felt is not someone we would want young people to emulate. However, even though Mr. Felt acted for his own selfish reasons, his unlawful and immoral actions resulted in great benefit to the morality of the nation. He explains:
"At the time of Watergate, the nation had just suffered through the moral upheaval of the 1960s: antiwar activism, the hippy rebellion, political assassinations. It's notable here that the first story Mr. Felt helped Bob Woodward on was an assassination attempt on George Wallace. Earlier Mr. Felt had tipped Mr. Woodward off that Vice President Spiro Agnew had accepted a bribe--a charge Mr. Woodward had been unable to corroborate, but that ultimately led to Agnew's resignation."
The nation's moral down slide seems to have begun in 1960, when Richard Nixon was the victim of a "stolen election" by the Kennedy machine. Rather than subject the country to a bitter recount, as Al Gore did later in 2000, Nixon graciously conceded to John Kennedy. However, by the time Nixon won the presidency in 1968, instead of providing much-needed moral leadership, he was instead, ready to play down and dirty in the game of politics. Besides, he had J. Edgar Hoover as FBI director.

Some insiders finally realized that the corruption of the Nation's government had to end, and they began it with the repudiation of President Nixon, the highest officer implicated in the Watergate scandals. It took decades to restore a semblance of honesty in the Presidency. Jimmy Carter did his part, being indisputably an honest man. Then came Ronald Reagan. Those two presidents constructed the groundwork necessary to return the nation to its former standards of morality, as had been promised by the Founders. Mark Felt, right hand man of J. Edgar Hoover, should never be tauted as a hero, reluctant or otherwise, as his actions have always been those of a self-serving coward. Fortunately in the long run, the hand of Providence seems to have interceded in behalf of a nation, grateful not to the likes of Mark Felt and his ilk, but to Providence.

W. Mark Felt: Watergate "Deep Throat" and Alleged "Hero" = ME, Pique, Ego, Disloyalty, Opportunism, Self-Importance, Greed, Book Deal, Crass Politics, Disrespect and .... Liberal Approval. Cartoons by Nowak

Chasing Scorpions

We armchair patriots at home wish that every night for our military chaps in Iraq could be no more dangerous than hunting scorpions, something in which the Texans there should be quite skilled. PICTURE
Z Bar: Quiet Night: "Last night was pretty quiet. Nothing really happened, which I hear from my family and friends is a good thing. Last night was one of the few nights when nothing actually did happen. We did not confiscate any weapons or have any issues with any of the Local Nationals. My main goal last night, situation permitting, was to try and find the scorpion from the night before. I got lucky in two ways, one I found the scorpion and two the way I found him. ... It was so funny and a good break in the slow pace of Gunner Gate. Anyway it was pretty fun for one night in Iraq."

Thursday, June 02, 2005

Bank Involved in Slave Trade

Wachovia Bank has now issued an apology for its "past indiscretions", although the bank's representative has refused to "atone" for them. What in the world is this all about? Well ... Once upon a time, in the long ago past of two and a half centuries, in a "city of brotherly love", there lived a financier named Robert Morris. He built the house that became the Philadelphia home of President Washington. Morris is credited with having done more than any other of the early patriots to fund the Revolutionary War. It all began long before the American Revolution, when Morris was a signer in the fight against the Stamp Act. In 1775, he served as vice-president of Pennsylvania's Committee of Safety and at the same time he was elected to the provincial assembly, and became a delegate for Pennsylvania to the Continental Congress, where he was vitally involved in many committees. In 1776, he signed the Declaration of Independence and began his role as the emerging nation's chief financial agent. He risked his business reputation as well as his own finances and credit to keep the new government afloat. He served our nation at a very complicated and difficult time in its history. On several occasions he personally rescued the Revolution from collapse. As the Revolution progressed, Morris was reelected to the Pennsylvania assembly, attended the second Continental Congress, signed the Articles of Confederation, and founded the Bank of North America, the first incorporated national bank. In 1787, he helped in the drafting of the United States Constitution. He served as Pennsylvania's first senator to the United States Congress, and served on forty-one committees while there. While performing all of these services to the new nation, Morris managed to serve as a trustee of the Academy and College of Philadelphia (now the University of Pennsylvania) from 1778 until 1791.

After all of these illustrious accomplishments and financial successes, Morris left the Senate, and returned to commercial pursuits. This time he became engaged in land speculation which resulted in financial ruin through the dishonesty of his partner. Robert Morris, Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Patriot of the Revolution, was imprisoned for debt from 1798 until 1801, when the federal bankruptcy law was passed. His letters from prison reveal that he continued his generosity and good will and did not become vindictive. Five years after his release from Debtors Prison, he died in Philadelphia, in 1806.

One would expect the City of Brotherly Love, Philadelphia, to be proud and boastful of such an early inhabitant. Think again. One of the accomplishments of Robert Morris was that he founded the first incorporated national bank, The Bank of North America. Although that bank no longer exists, Wachovia Bank of North Carolina is now its direct descendant, and, as we were warned by the poet Stephen Crane;
"... the sins of the fathers shall be
visited upon the heads of the children,
even unto the third and fourth generation ...."
Morris and another merchant, Thomas Willig, purchased an indigo plantation in Mississippi, and with it were conveyed 'a number of Negroes.' In 1791, Morris and Thomas Willig used their profits from the slave trade to fund the establishment of the historic Bank of North America - now 200 plus years later, known as Wachovia Bank.

Wachovia Bank acknowledged and apologized for its historical links to slavery. This action was required by a recently passed City Council ordinance for corporations doing business with the city of Philadelphia. According to research by the bank, two of its predecessor institutions, the Georgia Railroad and Banking Co. and the Bank of Charleston, owned slaves, and five others had indirect links to slavery. Great Balls o' Fire - Who would have guessed?
Philadelphia Daily News | 06/02/2005 | Bank acknowledges, and apologizes for, links to slavery: "'That means they did not directly own slaves as the other two did, but the people that founded them, or directors of the bank, or account holders owned slaves or profited directly from slavery,' said Wachovia spokeswoman Barbara Nate. 'Or, they may have invested in or done business with companies that owned slaves or they may have invested in the bonds of slave states or municipalities,' Nate said.

"In a statement, Wachovia chairman and chief executive Ken Thompson said: 'We are deeply saddened by these findings. We apologize to all Americans, and especially to African-Americans and people of African descent. While we can in no way atone for the past, we can learn from it, and we can continue to promote a better understanding of the African-American story, including the unique struggles, triumphs and contributions of African-Americans, and their important role in America's past and present."
Does this apology make a difference? Not really, if you closely read the reply of Councilwoman Blondell Reynolds Brown, co-sponsor of the bill which makes the apology mandatory. When asked if the new found links to slavery will be used as the basis for lawsuits seeking reparations for descendants of slaves she said: "This is not the intent of this bill. Reparations is an issue that, when it takes place, has to happen at a federal level. The message sent is that companies are willing to abide by the terms of a social contract and to be collectively responsible for their behavior." Other cities that have passed similar ordinances are Chicago, Detroit, and the Capital of the Old Confederacy, Richmond, Virginia.

We now return to long dead Signer and Patriot, Robert Morris, a-moldering and a-turning in his grave. Would he have just stayed back in old England, where he was born, and not come to this new land and foment dissent and shouts for freedom. Without him, the Revolutionary War would have failed. We would be living under the rule of a British monarch or some other potentate, and all descendants of slaves would be happy and content. Whether they would now be free or in bondage, we will never know. Robert Morris was imprisoned for three years for debts, but he was never punished for owning slaves. Some sixty years after his death, a war erupted over the right to own slaves, and virtually every family in the American South suffered horrendous losses of lives and property. Northern families sacrificed their sons as well. The American president was assassinated. We know not the beginning of history, nor do we kin its ending. We know only that history travels on.

May God bless you Robert Morris, as your countrymen heirs will not.

Trackedback at Mudville Gazette

Tea Time in England

This post has been moved to "Kerfuffles".

Palace at Turtle Bay

The New Libertarian has posted the June 1st edition of their slick e-magazine. The headline story is "The Turtle Bay Puzzle Palace (PDF), Taking a closer look at the UN". It is quite amazing how well turned out and how simple to view these PDF files are now. They are much easier than creating web pages. Kerfuffles is a blog member of the Neo-Libertarian Network. Unfortunately the TLN has mispelled my name, and although I have contacted them about it, they do not seem to mind that grievous error. It is probably a Libertarian thing. I am just as bad when it comes to spelling Libertarian, which I constantly confuse the "a's" and the "e's". I suppose it is because I think of myself as having the political views of my "far removed" cousin Tom, the sage of Monticello. However, I did read the definition of a Neo-Libertarian at their site, and I qualified as I seem to be both a Pragmatic Domestic Libertarian (strong on defense), and a Big-Tent Libertarian.

Kerfuffles even has its own blog set up there at the TLN, check it out: http://www.qando.net/blogs/kerfluffles.aspx. How cool is that? Looks much more professional than the "real Kerfuffles".

Wednesday, June 01, 2005

Bill Maher - Public Idiot #1

Bill Maher, once again shows his respect for the men and women in uniform who put their lives on the line to protect his sorry hide. "'I have nothing but the highest regard for the men and women serving this country around the world" proclaimed Maher about the U.S. military on his May 13th "Real Time" show on HBO. American Daughter describes him as "dumb as a bag of hammers", with which phrase I must say that I take extreme umbrage. We have some hammers around my house and they are capable of performing worthwhile endeavors, something I have never witnessed in the case of Bill Maher. One thing is certain, both his intellect and his character cannot hold a candle to the majority of those young heroes serving in the American Armed Forces. Grunts - remember this the next time that Maher and his celebrity buddies such as Al Franken come a-calling on a USO tour. Maher says you are all "low-lying Lyndie England fruit". As for you HBO patrons who are enabling Maher and his ilk by paying for this claptrap, why not consider sending that money to a more worthwhile cause - the troops in Iraq or the many charities those troops are sponsoring?
Philadelphia Inquirer | 05/25/2005 | Foot in mouth disease:
Maher poked fun at the fact that the Army missed its recruiting goal by 42 percent in April: 'More people joined the Michael Jackson fan club.'

'We've done picked all the low-lying Lyndie England fruit, and now we need warm bodies,' Maher said, referring to one of the soldiers accused of abusing prisoners at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, and implying that the military only signs up 'bad apple' types.

Maher, who seems to have made a career of releasing statements clarifying his jokes, released a statement: 'I have nothing but the highest regard for the men and women serving this country around the world.'
Weapons of Mass Discussion blogs:
"If this is the lower level fruit, Mr. Maher, then you are nothing more than disposed of fertilizer. Mr. Maher, if this person is the lowest level fruit, this nation should be so lucky."
View the Video from OverSpun (wmv) WARNING: Keep a barf bag handy, Vulgar Language as usual from that crowd.
Real Time With Bill Maher Clip- Chicken Hawk Down
by @ 11:26 am.
Here’s Bill Maher’s last “New Rule” of the season- Chicken Hawk Down:
This is the response from The Democrat Underground: Bill Maher for Congress
More from Kerfuffles on Bill Maher: Bill Maher & Jesse Jackson, Bill Maher is Sick, Sick, Sick!

Tags: , , ,

Save the LLama Butchers

The The LLama Butchers need help desperately. The meaty, woolly, snippy beasts are attempting to slaughter Wonkette. Join in the mayhem ... if that is your thing: "If you are fed up with the whole Panties-in-a-wad-Sully/Wonkette/TPM/Willis Axis of soft-core liberal schmooze, link this post! Send a shiver down the spine of media elites everywhere!"

Deep Throat Revealed

Finally! They said he would never tell. But he's ninety-one years old now, and he is proud to be able to remember something at least. And of course, his family wants to cash in on his fame before it is too late. And now he's a hero! Yawn ...
My Way News: "The No. 2 guy from the FBI, that was a pretty good source," said Ben Bradlee, who had been the key editor at the Post in the Watergate era.

"Felt himself was mentioned several times over the years as a candidate for Deep Throat, but he regularly denied that he was the source.

'I would have done better,' Felt told The Hartford Courant in 1999. 'I would have been more effective. Deep Throat didn't exactly bring the White House crashing down, did he?'

Felt had expressed reservations in the past about revealing his identity, and about whether his actions were appropriate for an FBI man, his grandson said.

According to the article, Felt once told his son, Mark Jr., that he did not believe being Deep Throat 'was anything to be proud of. ... You (should) not leak information to anyone.'

His family members thought otherwise, and persuaded him to talk about his role in the Watergate scandal, saying he deserves to receive accolades before his death. His daughter, Joan, argued that he could 'make enough money to pay some bills, like the debt I've run up for the children's education.'

'As he recently told my mother, 'I guess people used to think Deep Throat was a criminal, but now they think he's a hero',' Jones said."