Dog on Car or Dog on Dinner Plate?

Dog on Car or Dog on Dinner Plate?

Which is worse? Carrying a dog in a dog carrier on top of a station wagon, or eating a dog? "Well, Barack Obama ate dog meat as he described in his 2007 biography "Dreams from My Father:"

"I learned how to eat small green chill peppers raw with dinner (plenty of rice), and, away from the dinner table, I was introduced to dog meat (tough), snake meat (tougher), and roasted grasshopper (crunchy) . . . . [Lolo] explained that a man took on the powers of whatever he ate: One day soon, he promised, he would bring home a piece of tiger meat for us to share."

Do you suppose that any lap dogs of Obama's Media Press Corps will be brave enough to ask the President about the crunchiness or taste of endangered species tiger? Come to think of it, we should all ask Barack Obama about the crunchiness of Media Lap Dogs, as he eats them every day for lunch. I am betting that they are not at all tough, are they Mr. President?

A Society Too Stupid to Survive

Sometimes societies become too stupid to survive.

In 1998, the nation of Great Britain appointed to the House of Lords its first Muslim life peer, Lord Baron Nazir Ahmed of Rotherham. With much praise of diversity, Lord Ahmed took his oath upon the Holy Qur'an. Recently, this celebrated member of Britain's House of Lords, announced a bounty of £10 million on both the heads of U.S. President Barack Obama and former U.S. President George W. Bush. What a proud day for that old-time "special relationship" between Britain and America ... NOT!

Which just goes to prove that sometimes societies become too stupid to survive. Goodbye UK. November 2012 will reveal if America is traveling that same Highway of No Return - Stupidity Road.

"I announce $10 million reward on George W Bush" (Lord Ahmed of Britain's House of Lords, April 11, 2012). http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-13-13845-Nazir-puts-$10m-bounty-on-Bush

Obama Campaign Insults Ann Romney

Hilary Rosen, an Obama campaign operative wished on national television that: "Mitt Romney wasn’t using his wife as a guide to women’s economic struggles because she had never worked a day in her life.”

Ann Romney stayed at home, supported her husband and raised five sons. She spent much of her spare time during her entire adult life, doing volunteer work with women of all races, all creeds, rich, poor, etcetera. Along life's way she had to battle both MS and cancer. Yet, in the eyes of the Obama campaign, because her husband did not use taxpayer funds to provide her with a six-figure-salaried position, as most American pols do, she is deemed worthless as a women because she "never worked a day in her life." At the same time, the Obama campaign buys votes from other women who have never worked a day in their lives - Obama supporters - who live off of the taxpayers' largess, instead of their husbands's salaries, and those women who "never worked a day" in their lives President Barack Obama finds to be praiseworthy women.

The Democrat media at CNN and HuffPost rushed to the defense of Barack Obama's War on Women, defending Hilary Rosen as a real woman because she "cares for two children by herself, doesn’t have horses or an elevator in her home."

Where is my barf bag, America?

The Evils of Wikipedia

"Lies, damned lies, and the wickedness of Wikipedia"

So who are the people who founded and run Wikipedia? I don't know, and nor have I any foolproof way of finding out, because the only way of doing so is by consulting Wikipedia itself: a hole-in-bucket solution to a hole-in-my-bucket problem … And so — do these wretched Wikipedia people ever lie awake worrying at the damage that the evil or the impressionable might inflict upon those who have been maligned in their uncontrolled and filthy internet gossip-shop, whose very power derives from the complete fiction that it is an "encyclopedia"?

I doubt it extremely: for of all the lies of our time, Wikipedia is surely the greatest.