Sunday, August 28, 2011

NPR Decrees Fatwa on Evangelical Christians

The current scheme by NPR (National Public Radio) to deny religious freedom to a group of Christians, is an attempt by NPR to overthrow the U.S. Government, as the U.S. Constitution guarantees all faiths the right to worship.

NPR (National Public Radio) has decreed FATWA (*) on Christian Evangelicals because of their "weird" tenets of faith and their acceptance of Apostles and Prophets which NPR's acceptable Christians have not believed in since Biblical times. We need to remind ourselves as Americans, especially those who be not Evangelical, that when any Christian sect is persecuted, religious freedom for all Christians is in peril. If a publicly funded organization condemned and accused Jews or Muslims because of the "weird" beliefs of their religions, said entity would be called out as anti-Semitic or Islamophobic. Now, virtually no one speaks up for persecuted Christians in America, as National Public Radio seeks to overthrow the U.S. Constitution's guarantee to protect the religious freedom of all Americans.

We also need to remind ourselves that Taxpayers Provide More Than 25 Percent of NPR's Funding and undoubtedly, a majority of those taxpayers are Christians. Hence, American Christians are funding the very ones who persecute them and attempt to overthrow the United States Constitution.

ALL Christians believe in what non-Christians and NPR interpret as weird, unscientific tenets of faith. All Christians! Catholics, main-line Protestants, and other NPR-approved, acceptable Christians, have not yet been Fatwaed by National Public Radio, but those churches should feel threatened nevertheless. To be a Christian is to believe in the narrative of Jesus, and from His birth to His death there is mysticism which cannot be explained by science. Taxpayer-supported National Public Radio (NPR) has gone to war against Evangelical Christians because they are "weird" Christians. NPR seeks to convince their uneducated listeners that "weird" Christians are unqualified from holding public office in the United States of America. NPR and its listeners are oblivious to America's history and its founding by radical Christians from Europe, including the Puritans and Pilgrims, who like Evangelicals today, were Fatawed in their time and driven from their native homes.

If NPR wants to continue to discredit, ridicule and attempt to disenfranchise Christians, it should learn to do so on its own dime, instead of beggaring public funds from taxpaying Christians who are currently FORCED to send their hard-earned dollars to the government.

Read what the self-described kind, tolerant, erudite NPR Listeners have to say about their fellow Americans because of their weird belief in Jesus: Evangelicals are Engaged in Spiritual Warfare.

(*) Fatwa, meaning severe denunciation, usually of religious issues, is a Semitic root word, which has been used in the English language since 1625.

Monday, August 15, 2011

Dominionism - Christian Bigotry from Leftists

Dominionism is Christian Bigotry straight up!

Dominionism has been made up by Leftist journalists (Wikipedia ♥ Leftists) to smear Conservative candidates who are of the Christian Faith. This smear began with President George W. Bush, and after eight years, where is the Theocracy the Left predicted that President Bush was implementing?

Michelle Goldberg, the Daily Beast's authority on Christianity, has resurrected this over-sensationalized Dominionism garbage. Goldberg is clueless about religion and no one with a brain believes that Christians are plotting "political Islamism" as she accused. She wrote that Pentecostalists practice magic, something that they in fact view as sinful and demonic!

There is no reason to ever accept this Dominionism as anything but a cheap, bigoted hit piece against a particular religion, and typical crapola from Tina Brown. The Daily Beast & Newsweek are now The Newsweek Daily Beast Company with Tina Brown editor-in-chief of both. Believe her all you want, but she has covered herself in sleaze with what she has published, and everyone knows it.

Someone should ask these unthinking Leftists why, if a Theocracy has always been the objective of American Christians, was it not implemented 235 years ago when Christians were designing a form of government for their new American nation.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Writings of Adam Serwer Lack Basic Logic

In this thoroughly disjointed pile of horse manure, Adam Serwer calls out Michelle Bachmann as RACIST™ because she read a biography of General Robert E. Lee. He quotes the supposedly RACIST™ writings of "J. Steven Williams" and then deduces that since Bachmann reads Williams, she too is a RACIST™. Problem is - there is NO such person as "J. Steven Williams." If only Serwer could spell - but that would be too much to expect of Leftist writers who appear in "The American Prospect."

She is also a fan of Robert E. Lee biographer J. Steven Williams, whom Lizza describes as a "leading proponent of the theory that the South was an orthodox Christian nation unjustly attacked by the godless North." Wilkins "approvingly" cites Lee's conviction that abolition was premature because it was necessary for "the sanctifying effects of Christianity” to take their time “to work in the black race and fit its people for freedom.” Not only that but as Lizza reports, Williams hates abolitionists and thought slavery was awesome:

"Bachmann's Views On Slavery Are Worse Than You Thought", except that Adam Serwer is not honest enough to tell you that they are not Bachmann's views, but are the views of the fictional "J. Steven Williams" as described by someone named Lizza. Here is some Good Advice: Adam Sewer should look for another line of work; misspelling deliberate. Adam Serwer's Writings Are Worse Than You Ever Imagined including misquotes, illogic, misspellings.

Although Bachmann did misspeak, using the name of John Quincy Adams, for Founding Father John Adams, she was  correct in describing how he and other Founders hoped for the abolition of slavery: "Every measure of prudence, therefore, ought to be assumed for the eventual total extirpation of slavery from the United States ... I have, throughout my whole life, held the practice of slavery in ... abhorrence." -- John Adams, letter to Robert Evans, June 8, 1819.

Saturday, August 06, 2011

Who Outed Seal Team 6?

Since President Barack Obama announced that “a small team of Americans” had killed Osama bin Laden, US government officials have carefully stuck to the line that they will not talk about which units were involved.

Obama did not say it was the SEALs. In numerous television appearances, Obama’s counter-terrorism chief John Brennan didn’t and his deputy national security adviser Denis McDonough didn’t. Despite the numerous news reports that named the SEALs, none of the anonymous briefers from the CIA and Pentagon would confirm it.

Who was it who spilled the beans and put the life of every Navy Seal in danger? Here’s what "legendarily verbose and loose-lipped Vice President Joe Biden said at a dinner at Washington’s Ritz Carlton Hotel" a few days after Obama Bin Laden was killed by American forces in Pakistan: "Admiral James Stavridis is a, is the real deal. He can tell you more about and understands the incredible, the phenomenal, the just almost unbelievable capacity of his Navy SEALs and what they did last Sunday." The Telegraph, May 4th, 2011

Today, in KABUL, Afghanistan, Taliban Insurgents shot down a U.S. military helicopter killing 30 American warriors, most of them belonging to the same elite Navy SEALs unit that killed Osama bin Laden, as well as seven Afghan commandos. It was the deadliest single loss for American forces in the decade-old war. "The downing was a stinging blow to the lauded, tight-knit SEAL Team 6, months after its crowning achievement. It was also a heavy setback for the U.S.-led coalition as it begins to draw down thousands of combat troops fighting what has become an increasingly costly and unpopular war." (30 U.S. Troops Killed in Afghanistan) News updates are describing that 22 of those 30 (or 31) warriors were members of SEAL Team 6.

Who Was It Who "Spiked the Football" Rather Than Protect the Anonymity of Seal Team 6?
Once the National Security Beans were Spilled, it was "Katy Bar the Door" if you can, as Obama, his aides, the CIA and the Pentagon practically tripped over one another in their zeal to have their President bask in the glory of Seal Team 6. It is described today of all days by Maureen Dowd, of the New York Times, August 6, 2011:
[Obama] personally refocused the mission to capture the 9/11 architect after W. dropped the ball. He has told people what a thrill it was to meet SEAL Team 6 — and the dog Cairo — which pulled off the hit, noting that the men looked less young and fearsome than he expected, and more like guys working at Home Depot.

The White House clearly blessed the dramatic reconstruction of the mission by Nicholas Schmidle in The New Yorker — so vividly descriptive of the SEALS' looks, quotes and thoughts that Schmidle had to clarify after the piece was published that he had not actually talked to any of them. "I'll just say that the 23 SEALs on the mission that evening were not the only ones who were listening to their radio communications," Schmidle said.

The White House is also counting on the Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal big-screen version of the killing of bin Laden to counter Obama's growing reputation as ineffectual. The Sony film by the Oscar-winning pair will no doubt reflect the president's cool, gutsy decision against shaky odds. Just as Obamaland was hoping, the movie is scheduled to open on Oct. 12, 2012 — perfectly timed to give a home-stretch boost to a campaign that has grown tougher.

The moviemakers are getting top-level access to the most classified mission in history from an administration that has tried to throw more people in jail for leaking classified information than the Bush administration. It was clear that the White House had outsourced the job of manning up the president's image to Hollywood when Boal got welcomed to the upper echelons of the White House and the Pentagon and showed up recently — to the surprise of some military officers — at a CIA ceremony celebrating the hero SEALs.
Connecting the Dots - What Really Happened?

Friday, August 05, 2011

Democrats - The REAL Hostage Takers

Hostage Takers!
Although President Barack Obama has been accusing the Republicans in Congress of holding "a Gun against the Heads of the American People to extract tax breaks for corporate jet owners," the real "Hostage Takers" in America are the leaders in the Democrat Party. They showed their "Hostage Taking" bonafides in the 2008 Obama Presidential campaign when they threatened America - "Vote for Barack Obama or else we will continue to call out America as a RACIST™ nation."

Jacob Weisberg, editor of Slate Magazine, in a 2008 article titled "If Obama Loses" wrote that "racism is the only reason McCain might beat" Obama. So ... Americans capitulated to the "Hostage Takers" and elected Barack Obama as their President, rather than be accused of RACISM™ by voting for a genuine American military hero, John McCain.

Then of course, as "Hostage Takers" will do you, Democrats did not keep their promise. Immediately after the 2008 Election of the promised "Hope and Change" President who would transcend Race, the Obama White House and its army of acolytes called out Americans as RACIST™, even those Americans who had cast their votes for Barack Obama.

Hostage Takers! That's just how Democrats will do you.